2001
DOI: 10.1521/jscp.20.4.521.22399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of The Dimensionality of Unrealistic Optimism For The Study of Perceived Health Risks

Abstract: To examine the dimensions of unrealistic optimism, 635 college students indicated their relative likelihood of experiencing 25 health problems commonly used in studies of unrealistic optimism. Factor analyses of these estimates yielded five correlated, but distinct factors, suggesting that unrealistic optimism is not a unidimensional construct. Two factors, Common and Mixed, were comprised of heterogeneous problems. The Common factor was comprised of problems similar to those frequently used in other studies, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They perceived that their own chances of experiencing health risks as less likely than those of other people. This finding agrees with previous studies which indicate that many individuals engage in risky behaviours in part because they underestimate the likelihood that they will experience health problems, and such underestimates have been referred to as perception bias (2,19). As for underestimation and perception bias, it is possible to hold view that people have egocentric dispositions and either underestimate or ignore the risks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…They perceived that their own chances of experiencing health risks as less likely than those of other people. This finding agrees with previous studies which indicate that many individuals engage in risky behaviours in part because they underestimate the likelihood that they will experience health problems, and such underestimates have been referred to as perception bias (2,19). As for underestimation and perception bias, it is possible to hold view that people have egocentric dispositions and either underestimate or ignore the risks.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…First, it may show that the two forms are independent. Such a finding would add to the handful of studies suggesting that there are multiple, relatively independent types of comparative optimism (Hoorens, 1996; Nezlek & Zebrowski, 2001). Second, it may show that the two forms of comparative optimism tap into the same construct.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…For desirable events, people typically show comparative optimism when the event is common, but not, or to a lesser degree, when the event is rare. Conversely, for undesirable events, people typically show comparative optimism when the event is rare but not, or to a lesser degree, when the event is common (Covey & Davies, 2004; Klar, Medding, & Sarel, 1996; Madey & Gomez, 2003; Nezlek & Zebrowski, 2001; Price, Pentecost, & Voth, 2002; Weinstein, 1980, 1987; Whalen et al , 1994).…”
Section: Comparative Optimism About Event Likelihoodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convincing people to adopt prudent health behaviors may be more difficult if they believe they are either not susceptible to a disease or less susceptible than others ( 23 ). Individuals in general believe that they are less likely than other people to experience negative health outcomes ( 24 ). Raats and Sparks ( 25 ) found that there is a tendency for individuals to indicate that other people have a higher risk than themselves for experiencing a negative life event.…”
Section: Unrealistic Optimismmentioning
confidence: 99%