“…Questions have arisen though about the validity of immunoassay oxytocin measurement and of peripheral markers as indicators of central oxytocinergic functioning. For example, there is debate about the optimal measurement methods and processes (e.g., use of extracted vs. unextracted samples; use of enzyme assays vs. radio-immunoassay), as well the fluid of choice in which to measure oxytocin (i.e., saliva vs. blood, urine or CSF) (Carter et al, 2007;Kagerbauer et al, 2013;Lebowitz, Gee, Pine, & Silverman, 2018;McCullough, Churchland, & Mendez, 2013;Szeto et al, 2011;Young & Anderson, 2010). These important questions notwithstanding, a wealth of data from numerous studies support the usefulness of measuring peripheral oxytocin levels, reporting highly stable oxytocin levels over periods of several months, and associations between peripheral oxytocin levels and behavioral indicators in line with what theory would predict, and pointing to coordination between peripheral and central oxytocinergic functioning (Crockford et al, 2014;Weisman et al, 2013).…”