2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29347-4_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications on Ordered Fuzzy Numbers and Fuzzy Sets of Type Two

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus given disjunction and complement, implication can be defined in the standard way. Such a new operator on the set N was introduced by Kacprzak and Kosiński and is called 2K-fuzzy implication [28,29,38]. The set of all OFNs is not a complete lattice, therefore the way of defining implication is still an open question.…”
Section: Fuzzy Implication On Bsofnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus given disjunction and complement, implication can be defined in the standard way. Such a new operator on the set N was introduced by Kacprzak and Kosiński and is called 2K-fuzzy implication [28,29,38]. The set of all OFNs is not a complete lattice, therefore the way of defining implication is still an open question.…”
Section: Fuzzy Implication On Bsofnmentioning
confidence: 99%