2023
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2022.3217137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit Annealing in Kernel Spaces: A Strongly Consistent Clustering Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent advancements in convex or concave fusion methods have shown promise in enhancing stability, achieving more consistent global or local optimality and reliable estimation of cluster centers and counts through sparseinducing penalties on pairwise centers [6][7][8][9]. For clustering high-dimensional data, the data can be mapped into a high-dimensional feature space (kernel space) for processing [10], or clustering can be achieved by optimizing a smooth and continuous objective function that is based on robust statistics [11]. This paper introduces a comprehensive empirical validation of these methods across simulation studies and real data analysis, detailing their improved stability over traditional methods and the practical implications of these advancements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advancements in convex or concave fusion methods have shown promise in enhancing stability, achieving more consistent global or local optimality and reliable estimation of cluster centers and counts through sparseinducing penalties on pairwise centers [6][7][8][9]. For clustering high-dimensional data, the data can be mapped into a high-dimensional feature space (kernel space) for processing [10], or clustering can be achieved by optimizing a smooth and continuous objective function that is based on robust statistics [11]. This paper introduces a comprehensive empirical validation of these methods across simulation studies and real data analysis, detailing their improved stability over traditional methods and the practical implications of these advancements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%