2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit attention to negative social, in contrast to nonsocial, words in the Stroop task differs between individuals high and low in loneliness: Evidence from event-related brain microstates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
64
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
64
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the notion that the lonelier a person feels, the more attentive they are to the social context in the presence of negative stimuli or threats (Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009;Cacioppo, Grippo, et al, 2015;Qualter et al, 2015). In addition, the study revealed loneliness to be associated with reduced activation of the temporal parietal junction (TPJ), a brain area involved in self-representation (Blanke, Ortigue, Landis, & Seeck, 2002;Blanke et al, 2005;Boehme, Miltner, & Straube, 2014) in response to unpleasant social than nonsocial pictures, which is consistent with lonely individuals being more focused on themselves and on selfpreservation in negative social contexts (Cacioppo, Balogh, & Cacioppo, 2015;Cacioppo, Grippo, et al 2015;Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009).…”
Section: Loneliness and Social Threatsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This is consistent with the notion that the lonelier a person feels, the more attentive they are to the social context in the presence of negative stimuli or threats (Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009;Cacioppo, Grippo, et al, 2015;Qualter et al, 2015). In addition, the study revealed loneliness to be associated with reduced activation of the temporal parietal junction (TPJ), a brain area involved in self-representation (Blanke, Ortigue, Landis, & Seeck, 2002;Blanke et al, 2005;Boehme, Miltner, & Straube, 2014) in response to unpleasant social than nonsocial pictures, which is consistent with lonely individuals being more focused on themselves and on selfpreservation in negative social contexts (Cacioppo, Balogh, & Cacioppo, 2015;Cacioppo, Grippo, et al 2015;Cacioppo & Hawkley, 2009).…”
Section: Loneliness and Social Threatsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Studies designed to identify the mechanisms underlying the association between loneliness and mortality have found that loneliness is associated with increased hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) activity (Adam et al, 2006;Cacioppo et al, 2006;Doane and Adam, 2010;Glaser et al, 1985;Kiecolt-Glaser et al, 1984;Steptoe et al, 2004), altered gene expression indicative of decreased inflammatory control and increased glucocorticoid insensitivity (Cole et al, 2007(Cole et al, , 2011, increased inflammation, elevated vascular resistance, and blood pressure (Hackett et al, 2012;Hawkley et al, 2006Hawkley et al, , 2010bJaremka et al, 2013), higher rates of metabolic syndrome (Whisman, 2010), diminished immunity (Dixon et al, 2006;Glaser et al, 2005;Kiecolt-Glaser et al, 1984;Pressman et al, 2005;StraitsTröster et al, 1994), increased risk for age-related cognitive decline and dementia (Wilson et al, 2007), and increased sleep fragmentation (Cacioppo et al, 2002;Hawkley et al, 2010a;Jacobs et al, 2006;Kurina et al, 2011). Cross-lagged panel analyses have also shown that loneliness has also been associated with changes in psychological states that can contribute to morbidity and mortality, including increased depressive symptomatology (Booth, 2000;Cacioppo et al, 2006Cacioppo et al, , 2010VanderWeele et al, 2011), lower subjective wellbeing (Kong and You, 2013;VanderWeele et al, 2012), heightened vigilance for social threats (Cacioppo et al, 2015b), and decreased executive functioning (Baumeister and DeWall, 2005;Cacioppo et al, 2000;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El PSEC-1.0 puede ser utilizado en estudios con variables de vulnerabilidad cognitiva relacionadas con patologías cuyos síntomas sean particulares a la depresión y ansiedad social como el aislamiento y el uso de palabras que indican aceptación social, teniendo en cuenta las limitaciones que han reportado estudios como el de S. Cacioppo, Balogh y J. T. Cacioppo (2015), en el cual los tiempos de respuestas en la tarea de Stroop fueron estadísticamente diferentes entre personas con altos y bajos niveles de aislamiento, al parecer involucrando funciones ejecutivas como el control y la orientación; estos autores sugieren que estas diferencias se debieron a factores evolutivos no precisados aún en los modelos de patología. De igual forma, se ha recomendado incluir además de un conjunto de palabras para evaluar depresión, uno que contenga la tarea de Stroop como marcador para evaluar conducta suicida en población estudiantil de riesgo, siguiendo los hallazgos de Chung y Jeglic (2016), según los cuales aquellos que tenían ideación o tendencia suicida respondieron de manera más lenta a la palabra "suicidio" que la población no suicida, particularmente las mujeres.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…El PSEC-1.0 puede ser utilizado en estudios con variables de vulnerabilidad cogni tiva relacionadas con patologías cuyos sínto-mas sean particulares a la depresión y ansiedad social como el aislamiento y el uso de palabras que indican aceptación social, teniendo en cuenta las limitaciones que han reportado estudios como el de S. Cacioppo, Balogh y J. T. Cacioppo (2015).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified