2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2016.7487758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit belief-space pre-images for hierarchical planning and execution

Abstract: We present a method for planning and execution in very high-dimensional mixed discrete and continuous spaces in the presence of uncertainty using an implicit, factored approximation representation of pre-images and extend it to planning in belief space. We demonstrate the approach in a mobile-manipulation domain combining pushing with pick-andplace manipulation with error in sensing and manipulation. We show empirically that execution monitoring using pre-images improves computational efficiency over continual… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many approaches for representing and updating a belief such as joint, unscented Kalman filtering [23], [7], factoring the belief into independent distributions per object [15], [25], and maintaining a particle filter, which represents the belief as a set of weighted samples [17], [18], [19], [21]. Many approaches use a different belief representation when planning versus when filtering.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many approaches for representing and updating a belief such as joint, unscented Kalman filtering [23], [7], factoring the belief into independent distributions per object [15], [25], and maintaining a particle filter, which represents the belief as a set of weighted samples [17], [18], [19], [21]. Many approaches use a different belief representation when planning versus when filtering.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, replanning is required to take this additional state information into consideration. To resolve these issues, scholars [28,29,30,31,32] have suggested planning short term actions in more detail than those later in the planning horizon.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors use a hierarchical planning language in which the actions must be labelled with the level of abstraction, and the complete world state is always reasoned on. This has been expanded with belief states, that is, Belief Hierarchical Planning in the Now (BHPN), and planning using continuous state information (e.g., position) [30].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A body of relevant previous work incorporates heuristic search and classical AI techniques in algorithms for solving MDPs [21,22,23]. Several works from the robotics planning community solve related problems using local information to inform global planning and trajectory optimization [24,25] and explore various aspects of combined (discrete) task and (continuous) motion planning [3,2] such as planner-agnostic abstractions [26], stochastic shortest path formulations [27,28], and hierarchical planning and execution [29,30]. Our optimization-based formulation is similar to that for Logic-Geometric Programming [31].…”
Section: Related Work Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%