2015
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2014.0959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit constitutive relations for nonlinear magnetoelastic bodies

Abstract: Implicit constitutive relations that characterize the response of elastic bodies have greatly enhanced the arsenal available at the disposal of the analyst working in the field of elasticity. This class of models were recently extended to describe electroelastic bodies by the present authors. In this paper, we extend the development of implicit constitutive relations to describe the behaviour of elastic bodies that respond to magnetic stimuli. The models that are developed provide a rational way to describe ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, it includes the simple case of the strain expressed as a function of the stress, which appears more consistent with Newtonian causality than standard constitutive relations since force causes displacement. Implicit constitutive relations have found a wide range of applications in the modelling of electro- and magneto-elastic bodies [5,6], fracture in brittle materials [7,8], gum metal [9] and many other materials (see [10] for further references).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it includes the simple case of the strain expressed as a function of the stress, which appears more consistent with Newtonian causality than standard constitutive relations since force causes displacement. Implicit constitutive relations have found a wide range of applications in the modelling of electro- and magneto-elastic bodies [5,6], fracture in brittle materials [7,8], gum metal [9] and many other materials (see [10] for further references).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, if we define elasticity as the incapability of dissipation, then elastic bodies can be modeled by a wider class of relations between the stress variable and strain variable than those where the stress is a function of strain. This generalized notion of elasticity has had numerous applications in the modeling of electro and magneto-elastic bodies [6, 7], fracture in brittle materials [8, 9], gum metal [10], and many other materials (see the recent review [11] for further references).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, systematic procedures for identification of such models based on experimental data have not been reported in details so far. It is particularly mentioned in [32] that the given equations are ‘too general to be used to correlate with experimental data as there are so many material functions that depend on numerous invariants.' In this paper, we focus on identification of thermodynamic constitutive models based on the theory of invariants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications have included both isotropic [20,22] and anisotropic [26] solids as well as granular materials [27][28][29][30][31]. In [32], an extensive review of earlier magneto-elastic constitutive models is given, and implicit constitutive equations based on 21 scalar invariants are derived for bodies under large deformations. These equations are then simplified for small fields and applied for solving magneto-elastic boundary value problems for slabs and an annulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%