2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2501452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit Cue-Taking in Elections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory subjects can decipher the political party affiliation of both unfamiliar elected officials and college students (Rule and Ambady 2010) and can identify the political ideology of unknown politicians (Bull and Hawkes 1982), including those from other countries (Samochowiec, Wänke, and Fiedler 2010). 10 These inferences can be based on the appearance and characteristics of a candidate’s supporters: Berinsky et al (2014) use a survey experiment to demonstrate that the images of a candidate’s putative supporters as displayed on campaign material are used by voters to infer traits about the candidate.…”
Section: The Ground Campaign’s Principal-agent Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory subjects can decipher the political party affiliation of both unfamiliar elected officials and college students (Rule and Ambady 2010) and can identify the political ideology of unknown politicians (Bull and Hawkes 1982), including those from other countries (Samochowiec, Wänke, and Fiedler 2010). 10 These inferences can be based on the appearance and characteristics of a candidate’s supporters: Berinsky et al (2014) use a survey experiment to demonstrate that the images of a candidate’s putative supporters as displayed on campaign material are used by voters to infer traits about the candidate.…”
Section: The Ground Campaign’s Principal-agent Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%