2009
DOI: 10.22329/il.v29i1.683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit dialogical premises, explanation as argument: A corpus-based reconstruction

Abstract: This paper focuses on an explanation in a newspaper article: why new European Union citizens will come to the UK from Eastern Europe (e.g., because of available jobs). Using a corpus-based method of analysis, I show how regular target readers have been positioned to generate premises in dialogue with the explanation propositions, and thus into an understanding of the explanation as an argument, one which contains a biased conclusion not apparent in the text. Employing this method, and in particular 'corpus com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach connects with two distinct senses of “keyword” that are prominent in different parts of the literature. Cultural keywords (introduced already) are words with high cultural significance, and statistical keywords are words that stand out in a corpus because of high relative frequency or other statistical properties (Jeffries & Walker, 2012; O'Halloran, 2009; Stubbs, 2010). Some overlap between cultural and statistical keywords is expected, and we follow Jeffries and Walker (2012) in identifying cultural keywords by starting with a set of statistical keywords and filtering to retain only those of greatest cultural significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach connects with two distinct senses of “keyword” that are prominent in different parts of the literature. Cultural keywords (introduced already) are words with high cultural significance, and statistical keywords are words that stand out in a corpus because of high relative frequency or other statistical properties (Jeffries & Walker, 2012; O'Halloran, 2009; Stubbs, 2010). Some overlap between cultural and statistical keywords is expected, and we follow Jeffries and Walker (2012) in identifying cultural keywords by starting with a set of statistical keywords and filtering to retain only those of greatest cultural significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%