2022
DOI: 10.9707/2307-0919.1097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit Motives Across Cultures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no empirical research suggesting that antecedents of volunteering differ across cultures (Clary et al, 1998; Omoto & Snyder, 1995; Penner & Finkelstein, 1998). Neither do findings from motivational research indicate that implicit and explicit motives function differently across different cultures (for an overview, see Hofer & Chasiotis, 2011).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no empirical research suggesting that antecedents of volunteering differ across cultures (Clary et al, 1998; Omoto & Snyder, 1995; Penner & Finkelstein, 1998). Neither do findings from motivational research indicate that implicit and explicit motives function differently across different cultures (for an overview, see Hofer & Chasiotis, 2011).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas implicit motives develop during the pre-linguistic stage, the development of explicit motives is a cognition-driven process that takes place after language, self, and conceptual representations have been formed (Hofer & Chasiotis, 2011). Furthermore, the systems differ in how they develop and the type of behaviors they relate to.…”
Section: A Dual Process Approach To Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McClelland, Koestner, and Weinberger (1989) distinguished between two motivational systems: On the one hand there is a motivational system operating on the conscious level (explicit or self-attributed), and on the other hand a motivational system that functions at the preconscious level (implicit). Because of their preverbal origins and unconscious nature, implicit motives are measured through projective, fantasy-based methods such as the Thematic Apperception Test [TAT] (Murray, 1943) and its more recent modifications like the Picture Story Exercise [PSE] or the Operant Multimotive Test [OMT] (Hofer and Chasiotis, 2011; Schultheiss and Brunstein, 2010). Such implicit motive tests are therefore qualified for assessing contents of preverbal developmental phases and manifestations of unconscious affective dispositions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%