2023
DOI: 10.3390/jintelligence11050096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit Processing of Numerical Order: Evidence from a Continuous Interocular Flash Suppression Study

Abstract: Processing the ordered relationships between sequential items is a key element in many cognitive abilities that are important for survival. Specifically, order may play a crucial role in numerical processing. Here, we assessed the existence of a cognitive system designed to implicitly evaluate numerical order, by combining continuous flash suppression with a priming method in a numerical enumeration task. In two experiments and diverse statistical analysis, targets that required numerical enumeration were prec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study revealed no such differences in early time windows around P1 (85–135 ms) or N1 (140–190 ms), indicating that stimuli did not differ across conditions in terms of visual properties such as luminance, size, spatial frequencies, and so on. While it is plausible that ordered and unordered sequences in dot arrays can be differentiated early and potentially also implicitly in the processing stream [ 39 ], this might not be the case for symbolic stimuli. In contrast, our results indicate that accessing the meaning of ordered numerals occurs at a later time window and potentially engages different brain regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study revealed no such differences in early time windows around P1 (85–135 ms) or N1 (140–190 ms), indicating that stimuli did not differ across conditions in terms of visual properties such as luminance, size, spatial frequencies, and so on. While it is plausible that ordered and unordered sequences in dot arrays can be differentiated early and potentially also implicitly in the processing stream [ 39 ], this might not be the case for symbolic stimuli. In contrast, our results indicate that accessing the meaning of ordered numerals occurs at a later time window and potentially engages different brain regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study revealed no such differences in early time windows around P1 (85-135 ms) or N1 (140-190 ms), indicating that stimuli did not differ across conditions in terms of visual properties such as luminance, size, spatial frequencies, and so on. While it is plausible that ordered and unordered sequences in dot arrays can be differentiated early and potentially also implicitly in the processing stream (Sury & Rubinsten, 2023), this might not be the case for symbolic stimuli. In contrast, our results indicate that accessing the meaning of ordered numerals occurs at a later time window and potentially engages different brain regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%