1974
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7930(74)90022-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicit solutions of the unsteady Navier-Stokes equation for laminar flow through an orifice within a pipe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the studies by Coder and Buckley [18] and Durst et al [19], the flow Reynolds number is known to have significant effects on the flow field for a given bell-shaped constriction opening. Investigations are then focused here on the effects of the Reynolds number on the flow field and the maximum values of velocity (V max ), vorticity (V max ), shear stress (~m ax ), as well as the pressure loss (P loss ) across the ring-type constriction, the recirculation length (z r /D).…”
Section: Y-directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the studies by Coder and Buckley [18] and Durst et al [19], the flow Reynolds number is known to have significant effects on the flow field for a given bell-shaped constriction opening. Investigations are then focused here on the effects of the Reynolds number on the flow field and the maximum values of velocity (V max ), vorticity (V max ), shear stress (~m ax ), as well as the pressure loss (P loss ) across the ring-type constriction, the recirculation length (z r /D).…”
Section: Y-directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The plate thickness for each orifice was fixed at 0.2 times the pipe diameter and a 45-degree bevel was introduced into the downstream side of each orifice to a depth of 50 percent. Navier-Stokes equations were used as the starting point in their analysis and initial comparisons with steady flow data from Johansen (1930), Tuve and Sprenkle (1933), and Keith (1971) as presented by Coder (1973) showed good agreement with the resulting discharge coefficients. Results from the pulsating analysis were plotted as discharge coefficient vs. time for every 45 degrees, and show that the discharge coefficient initially oscillates around the discharge coefficient that would be expected for steady flow.…”
Section: Incompressible Flowmentioning
confidence: 94%