Implicit STEM ability beliefs predict secondary school students' STEM self‐efficacy beliefs and their intention to opt for a STEM field career

Abstract

Despite the widely accepted view that low self-efficacy beliefs negatively influence students' intention to opt for a STEM field oriented study or career path, it remains unclear how to effectively stimulate these beliefs in students who do seem to have the ability and motivation to opt for a STEM career. A suggestion from previous literature is that students' implicit beliefs about the malleability of their learning ability can have a major impact on their self-efficacy beliefs, and, importantly, that these implicit beliefs are malleable themselves. Even though this relation between implicit beliefs, self-efficacy, and STEM field aspirations has been suggested multiple times, there is no empirical evidence to support this claim. The goal of the current study was to examine whether implicit beliefs about the malleability of STEM ability are associated with secondary school students' intention to opt for a STEM field bachelor's degree, using a Structural Equation Modelling approach. Furthermore, we examined the mediating role of STEM-oriented self-efficacy beliefs on the relationship between implicit ability beliefs and STEM intention. We used a Likert-type questionnaire, consisting of subscales to measure ability beliefs, self-efficacy, and intention to opt for a STEM degree of secondary school students in their fifth grade (n = 483). Results showed that there is a positive relation between implicit STEM ability beliefs and the intention to opt for a STEM field bachelor degree, and that this relation is partly mediated by self-efficacy beliefs. Incremental STEM ability beliefs predicted positive selfefficacy beliefs and increased STEM intention. These findings provide a foundation for a novel approach to stimulate

Students' attitudes toward science and science achievement: An analysis of the differential effects of science instructional practices

“…Previous findings (Jansen, Scherer, & Schroeders, 2015) based on PISA 2006 data also support the positive association between science self‐efficacy and inquiry‐based learning opportunities. Given the important role of students' academic self‐efficacy in predicting academic achievement and even future involvement and occupation interests recognized in numerous studies (Britner & Pajares, 2006; Jansen et al, 2015; van Aalderen‐Smeets, van der Molen, & Xenidou‐Dervou, 2018), the use of inquiry‐based instructional practices in science classrooms is encouraged.…”

STEM stereotypes predict students’ STEM career interest via self-efficacy and outcome expectations

“…However, fewer studies tested the relationships among self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and career interest from an integrated STEM perspective (Nugent et al, 2015;van Aalderen-Smeets et al, 2018). Nugent et al (2015) found that in a crosssectional study that 10-to 14-year-old students' STEM interest predicted their STEM self-efficacy and outcome expectations.…”

Examining the yields of growth feedback from science teachers and students' intrinsic valuing of science: Implications for student‐ and school‐level science achievement

“…Improving students' science knowledge and skills is therefore considered essential for the future research and innovation that underpins a society's competitiveness (Australian Academy of Science, ). Thus, targeting improvement in students' science outcomes has become a focal point of much research and policy (Van Aalderen‐Smeets, Walma van der Molen, & Xenidou‐Dervou, ; Watt et al, ). At the same time, however, declines in students' valuing of science and science achievement are evident in Australia (the site of the present study) and many other western countries (OECD, , ).…”