2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implicitly and explicitly assessed anxiety: No relationships with recognition of and brain response to facial emotions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are in line with previous studies which have demonstrated that implicit affect, as measured by the IPANAT, can predict spontaneous psychophysiological and brain responses to emotional stimuli and stress ( Quirin et al, 2009b , Suslow et al, 2015 , van der Ploeg et al, 2016 ). In contrast, a previous study on emotional face recognition suggests that implicit anxiety, as determined by a performance based Implicit Association Test (IAT), is not associated with brain activity during controlled processing of briefly presented, masked fearful expressions ( Suslow et al, 2019 ). With regard to these null results and based on our findings, it can be argued that implicit anxiety rather facilitates automatic processing of fearful faces in the amygdala and temporal gyrus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Our findings are in line with previous studies which have demonstrated that implicit affect, as measured by the IPANAT, can predict spontaneous psychophysiological and brain responses to emotional stimuli and stress ( Quirin et al, 2009b , Suslow et al, 2015 , van der Ploeg et al, 2016 ). In contrast, a previous study on emotional face recognition suggests that implicit anxiety, as determined by a performance based Implicit Association Test (IAT), is not associated with brain activity during controlled processing of briefly presented, masked fearful expressions ( Suslow et al, 2019 ). With regard to these null results and based on our findings, it can be argued that implicit anxiety rather facilitates automatic processing of fearful faces in the amygdala and temporal gyrus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The functions of temporal lobe are linked to verbal expression and memory (35, 36). Processing happy facial expressions was related to the activation of the inferior temporal cortex (37), while when processing face emotion recognition tasks, temporal and parietal cortices showed higher activity in patients with general anxiety disorder than in healthy controls (38), which may indicate the insufficient ability in emotional working memory in the patient group. Existing study results showed the higher activation of the inferior temporal gyrus in the high anxious population compared to the low anxious population (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research found increased activity in the right parahippocampal gyrus of people with high anxiety compared to people with low anxiety (19). While processing the happy facial expressions, the parahippocampal gyrus showed increased activation compared to processing neutral facial expressions (37). Previous imaging research revealed the key role of the parahippocampal gyrus in anxiety, particularly linked to anxiety-related somatic complaints, and researchers found a correlation between the volume of parahippocampal and somatic complaints in non-clinical population (43).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation between speeded responses to fear and severity of anxiety is in line with findings suggesting that anxiety biases responses to affect-congruent stimuli. This association has been shown via increased accuracy of identification of fearful faces by individuals with high trait anxiety 64,65 (although other studies have failed to replicate this finding 66,67 ), and by increased accuracy of fearful face identification by healthy volunteers under threat of electrical shock, a condition that otherwise degrades accuracy of identification of neutral or happy faces 68 . A specific speeding of reaction time for identifying fearful faces has also been observed in adolescents with depressive and anxiety symptoms 69 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%