Importance and Nature of Short-Range Excitonic Interactions in Light Harvesting Complexes and Organic Semiconductors

Abstract

Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Publisher's statement:"This document is the Accepted Manuscript version of a Published Work that appeared in final form in Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. copyright © American Chemical Society after peer review and technical editing by the publisher. To access the final edited and published work http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/articlesonrequest/index.html ." A note on versions:The version presented here may differ from the published version or, version of record, if you wish to cite this item you are advised to consult the publisher's version. Please see the 'permanent WRAP URL above for details on accessing the published version and note that access may require a subscription. AbstractThe singlet excitonic coupling between many pairs of chromophores is evaluated in three different Light Harvesting Complexes (LHCs) and two organic semiconductors (amorphous and crystalline). This large database of structures is used to assess the relative importance of short-range (exchange, overlap, orbital) and long-range (Coulombic) excitonic coupling. We find that Mulliken atomic transition charges can introduce systematic errors in the Coulombic coupling and that the dipole-dipole interaction fails to capture the true Coulombic coupling even at intermolecular distances of up to 50 Å. The non-Coulombic short range contribution to the excitonic coupling is found to represent up to ~70% of the total value for molecules in close contact, while, as expected, it is found to be negligible for dimers not in close contact. For the face-to-face dimers considered here, the sign of the short range interaction is found to correlate with the sign of the Coulombic coupling, i.e. reinforcing it when it is already strong. We conclude that for molecules in van der Waals contact the inclusion of short range effects is essential for a quantitative description of the exciton dynamics.

n-Type organic semiconducting polymers: stability limitations, design considerations and applications

“…In summary, more efficient packing leads to improved charge carrier transport, higher mobilities 29 and short contact distances. [30][31][32][33] Factors which alter the packing of a material are strong dipole-dipole interactions, 34,35 degree of backbone planarity and steric locking of polymer backbones. 36,37 1.2.…”

fromage: A library for the study of molecular crystal excited states at the aggregate scale

“…The largest difference is of 26 meV, which represents 25% of the greatest coupling (105 meV). It is expected that in cofacial dimers with couplings of such magnitude, the short‐range interactions should account for most of the coupling, making the use of a coupling scheme which accounts for exchange imperative …”

The role of conical intersections on the efficiency of fluorescent organic molecular crystals

“…Ref. 23 found that when Coulombic coupling exceeds 70 meV in organic semiconductor materials and light-harvesting complexes, the exchange portion of the coupling always shares a sign with its electrostatic counterpart, thus increasing the total coupling. This is consistent with the deviation of the limiting behaviour of the total coupling from a Coulombic inverse law.…”