2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.000163.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of Buffer Mechanisms for Population Viability Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our results bring empirical support to the growing body of theoretical studies suggesting that failure to account for the influence of non-breeders (e.g. floaters) on estimates of stochastic population dynamics may lead to incorrect projections of population growth and extinction risk [11,19,49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, our results bring empirical support to the growing body of theoretical studies suggesting that failure to account for the influence of non-breeders (e.g. floaters) on estimates of stochastic population dynamics may lead to incorrect projections of population growth and extinction risk [11,19,49].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Indeed, buffer mechanisms have been suggested to reduce the variation in population growth rates associated with the environmental noise [19], which in turn decreases the time populations spend at low abundances levels [48] and, consequently, may reduce the extinction risk of small populations subjected to negative effects of stochasticity. This theoretical scenario is likely to occur in our study system, where floaters buffer the extinction risk of small local populations subjected to both demographic and environmental stochasticity [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…individuals that can quickly replace breeders allows breeding numbers to remain stable (Walters, Crowder & Priddy, 2002;Grimm et al, 2005). As also stressed by Pontier et al (2008), floaters may have very important consequences for the stochastic extinction of bird populations, through a mechanism known as the buffer effect (Grimm et al, 2003(Grimm et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Conclusion: Floaters Necessary But Sometimes Hostilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As also stressed by Pontier et al (2008), floaters may have very important consequences for the stochastic extinction of bird populations, through a mechanism known as the buffer effect (Grimm et al, 2003(Grimm et al, , 2005. Because bird numbers may exhibit important interannual variations (due to both environmental and demographic stochasticity), the presence of a pool of sexually mature individuals that do not breed acts like a buffer, allowing to compensate for losses in the subpopulation of breeders and, consequently, to improve their persistence probability.…”
Section: Conclusion: Floaters Necessary But Sometimes Hostilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They mostly breed in colonies and are philopatric to the natal site, although dispersal (both natal and breeding) occurs. For seabirds, estimation of underlying demographic rates is particularly important because declines in breeding populations can be influenced substantially by nonbreeders and immature birds (Grimm et al 2005, Votier et al 2008a. The influence of non-breeders and immature birds is particularly strong when populations are density-dependent and large numbers of sexually mature birds are queuing for recruitment; these birds can rapidly integrate into the breeding population when additive mortality occurs (Tavecchia et al 2007, Votier et al 2008a.…”
Section: Population Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%