1993
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1993.11.11.2167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of continued testicular suppression in hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Abstract: This retrospective study showed a modest advantage in survival duration for men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer who continued to receive testicular androgen suppression. The hypothesis that continued hormonal maneuvers can still affect survival in this group warrants examination in prospective trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
0
13

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
72
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Treatment options for metastatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer (MHRPC) include second-line hormone manipulations, palliative chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, radio-isotopes, or best supportive care. The role of continued androgen suppression following diagnosis of MHRPC is controversial, although there is evidence suggestive of a moderate survival benefit for this approach (2). Options for hormonal manipulations include the addition of anti-androgens, followed by withdrawal, corticosteroids or oestrogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment options for metastatic Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer (MHRPC) include second-line hormone manipulations, palliative chemotherapy, bisphosphonates, radio-isotopes, or best supportive care. The role of continued androgen suppression following diagnosis of MHRPC is controversial, although there is evidence suggestive of a moderate survival benefit for this approach (2). Options for hormonal manipulations include the addition of anti-androgens, followed by withdrawal, corticosteroids or oestrogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing maximal testicular androgen suppression is debatable in this situation (9). These data have been argued by 2 studies that established only a survival advantage in patients continuing GnRH analogues during second-and third-line therapies in case of failure (10,11). The modest potential benefits of a continuing castration outweigh the minimal risk of treatment despite lack of prospective data in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Az LH RH agonisták és antagonisták alkalmazása a betegség mindkét szakaszában szükséges, mivel retrospektív vizsgálatok alapján ezzel megnövelhető a betegek túlélése [14].…”
Section: Lh Rh Antagonistaunclassified