2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of fighting in the immune effects of social defeat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect was not generalized to all cytokines, since IFN-Á production was not affected. In a qualitative point of view, these results were similar to what was previously observed in non-infected mice [17,23] and confirm the enhancing influence of SDR on IL-6 production [14,15]. However, enhancement in IL-6 release seemed to be of a smaller extent 8 days after the stress than 1 day after, as reported previously [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This effect was not generalized to all cytokines, since IFN-Á production was not affected. In a qualitative point of view, these results were similar to what was previously observed in non-infected mice [17,23] and confirm the enhancing influence of SDR on IL-6 production [14,15]. However, enhancement in IL-6 release seemed to be of a smaller extent 8 days after the stress than 1 day after, as reported previously [17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…SDR reduces the sensitivity of spleen cells to corticosterone in Balb/c mice [23]. When assessed 1 day after the end of SDR sessions, this effect can be easily detected by measuring IL-6 production in supernatants of spleen cells cultured with increasing doses of corticosterone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These stress-induced effects are not inconsequential; high stress reactivity has been linked to increased susceptibility to infection and immune dysfunction (Black, 2002;Padgett and Glaser, 2003;Glaser and Kiecolt-Glaser, 1998;Kiecolt-Glaser et al, 2002;Liu et al, 2002;Rohleder et al, 2001;Cohen and Hamrick, 2003). Some of these effects can be modeled on the laboratory, and as we and others have shown, social defeat activates the core stress responses and can have deleterious immunological effects on defeated mice (Devoino et al, 2003;Merlot et al, 2003;Padgett et al, 1998;Sheridan et al, 2000), including increased proinflammatory cytokine production, splenomegaly, trafficking of lymphocytes to the spleen, and insensitivity to the antiproliferative effects of glucocorticoids in LPS-stimulated splenocytes (Avitsur et al, 2003;Bailey et al, 2006;Engler et al, 2005;Stark et al, 2001). Although slight differences occurred between C57BL/6 mice and CD-1 mice, the present data indicate that the development of anxiety-like behavior can be added to the list of consequences mediated by social disruption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to establish chronic subordinate colony housing (CSC) in male mice as a clinically relevant chronic psycho-social stressor measuring relevant behavioral and physiological markers (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), and to investigate the influence of exposure to 19 d of CSC on established histological parameters of the colon (28,29) (experiment 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%