2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of filter’s microstructure in dynamic filtration modeling of gasoline particulate filters (GPFs): Inhomogeneous porosity and pore size distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this state, the porosities across the substrate of the coconut fibers might influence the filter efficiency. As confirmed in the previous study, the porosity distribution of the filter, including the pore size distribution, can represent the performance of a particulate filter [13]. The porosity level of a filter has a correlation with the filter thickness and density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In this state, the porosities across the substrate of the coconut fibers might influence the filter efficiency. As confirmed in the previous study, the porosity distribution of the filter, including the pore size distribution, can represent the performance of a particulate filter [13]. The porosity level of a filter has a correlation with the filter thickness and density.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In order to apply the Kalman filter-based approach for the simulation of other particulate filters with very different microstructure such as gasoline particulate filter (GPF) with inhomogeneous porosity and pore size distribution in Gong et al, 32 the filtration model within the reduced order model equations have to be modified to account for the varying porosity and pore size distribution within each zone of the multi-zone reduced order model presented in this work. In the reduced order MPF model, the substrate wall within each zone is discretized into n number of slabs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each slab, the porosity of the substrate wall is evolved based on the PM mass deposition on a series of spherical collectors considering the Brownian diffusion and interception filtration mechanisms. 17 With the inhomogeneous porosity and pore size distribution of the filters, the initial porosity of the each slab of the substrate wall will have to be modified along with the varying diameters of the spherical collectors as explained in Gong et al 32 By accounting for the varying porosity and pore size distribution (i.e. diameter of the spherical collector) for each slab, the filtration efficiency, wall permeability, and wall pressure drop can be estimated at each zone using the reduced order MPF model classical filtration equations in Mahadevan 17 and EKF equations presented in this research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of this study is to investigate deep-bed filtration process of the porous wall taking the PSD into consideration, as shown in Figure 1. In this paper, a non-uniform multi-scale porous wall model based on pore size distribution probability density function is constructed according to the dynamic Heterogeneous Multiscale Filtration (HMF) model, 2729 considering three different PSDs. The evolution of particle deposition and filtration performance of a GPF whose porosity is higher at both ends than that in the middle of the porous wall are studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%