2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of frequent storm flow data for evaluating changes in stream water chemistry following clear-cutting in Japanese headwater catchments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Antecedent rainfall events might also impact water chemistry. However, in the two catchments, the fluctuations of water chemistry were usually small, even 1-2 days after rainfall events of 100 mm (Oda et al, 2011, for Inokawa; Figure S3 for Oborasawa) and at least 4 days passed between large rainfall events and our observations. The influence of rainfall events on the water chemistry results was thus assumed to be negligible, but this might still be a source of uncertainty.…”
Section: Influence Of Antecedent Rainfall Events On Stream Discharge ...mentioning
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antecedent rainfall events might also impact water chemistry. However, in the two catchments, the fluctuations of water chemistry were usually small, even 1-2 days after rainfall events of 100 mm (Oda et al, 2011, for Inokawa; Figure S3 for Oborasawa) and at least 4 days passed between large rainfall events and our observations. The influence of rainfall events on the water chemistry results was thus assumed to be negligible, but this might still be a source of uncertainty.…”
Section: Influence Of Antecedent Rainfall Events On Stream Discharge ...mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Recently, the importance of direct runoff periods for quantifying annual chemical flux has been recognized (Oda et al, 2011;Raymond & Saiers, 2010;Zarnetske et al, 2018). The study of REA began with investigations of the spatial variability in rainfall-runoff responses using a hydrological model.…”
Section: Water Resources Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrogen is a vital element for forest productivity and thus a commonly reported solute in previous studies of forest disturbance. Excess nitrogen leaching, mainly as nitrate, usually occurs following forest disturbance (Likens et al, 1970), and increased nitrate leaching has been documented in response to cutting (Bormann & Likens, 1979;Cummins & Farrell, 2003;Martin et al, 2000;Mupepele & Dormann, 2017;Oda et al, 2011;Reynolds et al, 1995), fire (Knoepp & Swank, 1993;Meixner et al, 2003;Riggan et al, 1994), and insect defoliation and disease (Eshleman et al, 1998;Swank et al, 1981;Tokuchi et al, 2004). The initial nitrate concentration increase has been correlated to disturbance intensity (Wang et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cedar plantation forests located in central Japan, stream water NO 3 − concentrations increased dramatically after clear cutting (around 0.7 mgN l −1 ) and decreased after several years (Tokuchi and Fukushima, ). Oda et al () reported NO 3 − concentration increased (around 3.9 mgN l −1 ) after clear cutting of a mixed plantation of cedar and cypress ( Cryptomeria japonica and Chamaecyparis obtusa ). In the present study, the increases in DTN and TN between before and after thinning were calculated to be 0.34 and 0.46 mg l −1 , respectively (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because storm flow could affect downstream water quality as well as that of baseflow (Zhang et al , ; Oda et al , ), two kinds of water samples were collected in 500‐ml clean polyethylene bottles: baseflow and rainfall period samples. Baseflow samples were taken from stream water and ground water at an interval of about 2 weeks (sometimes 1 week to 1 month intervals) under a relatively low‐flow condition excluding the periods when there were heavy rainfalls within around 3 days before sampling.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%