2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.5.104402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of intersite Hubbard interactions in βMnO2 : A first-principles DFT+U+V study

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
49
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
7
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[10]. In fact, by constructing the localized perturbation (typically requiring costly calculations in supercells) as a series of independent monochromatic perturbations in the primitive unit cell, it improves significantly the computational efficiency, accuracy, user-friendliness, and automation [2,3], as also demonstrated by several recent applications [14,41,15,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Key to this successful implementation of the LR-cDFT is indeed the capability to express perturbation theory in reciprocal space as in the calculation of phonons using DFPT [50,51,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[10]. In fact, by constructing the localized perturbation (typically requiring costly calculations in supercells) as a series of independent monochromatic perturbations in the primitive unit cell, it improves significantly the computational efficiency, accuracy, user-friendliness, and automation [2,3], as also demonstrated by several recent applications [14,41,15,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Key to this successful implementation of the LR-cDFT is indeed the capability to express perturbation theory in reciprocal space as in the calculation of phonons using DFPT [50,51,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…With this choice of projector functions the electrons in the intersite overlap regions are not counted twice when computing the atomic occupations used in the Hubbard correction, as it is instead the case for the nonorthogonalized atomic orbitals φ I m (r). As a matter of fact, DFT+Hubbard with the Löwdin orthogonalized orbitals have proven to give more accurate results for various properties of materials [67][68][69][70][71][72], provided the Hubbard parameters are consistently computed with the Löwdin orthogonalized orbitals. Therefore, Hubbard parameters and Hubbard projectors should always be defined consistently and reported together.…”
Section: A Dft+hubbardmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in Ref. [50] we have shown that the most accurate description of the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of β-MnO 2 is obtained using Löwdin-orthogonalized atomic orbitals as Hubbard projectors.…”
Section: B Hubbard Parameters From Dfptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the vast majority of the DFT+U studies of α-MnO 2 , the U parameter is chosen empirically in the range from 1 to 6 eV [39,40,45] such that DFT+U reproduces well some experimental property of interest (e.g., the band gap) [47]. However, when selecting U empirically, it is often forgotten to pay attention also to the type of the Hubbard projectors that are used in various electronic-structure codes, as indeed the DFT+U results are extremely sensitive not only to the value of U but also to the type of these projectors [48][49][50]. Only in one DFT+U study of α-MnO 2 so far the value of U was computed from first principles (using the constrained DFT) [14], though no information is provided regarding the magnetic ordering used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation