Importance of locus of control in offenders with intellectual disability

Abstract

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:368933 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation. AbstractPurpose -Locus of control (LOC) is the manner in which one attributes their ability to make change in life. This could be through others, fate or chance (externalised), or through oneself (internalised). An internalised LOC results in greater self-belief in the ability to change one's behaviour. Non-disabled offenders with an internalised LOC are more likely to benefit from treatment through therapy and in turn have reduced rates of re-offending. The relationship between LOC and response to treatment is only understood in a limited way for offenders with intellectual disability (ID) who participate in treatment programmes. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach -To better understand LOC for offenders with ID, this paper investigates its role in community-based therapy outcomes along with its use as a common pre-/post-measure of treatment success in mainstream offender populations. Drawing upon these findings information more specific to people with ID will be discussed. Findings -This paper will then explore the importance of LOC in treating offenders with ID through a review of the current published literature, which generally indicates offenders with ID demonstrate a tendency towards an external LOC in comparison with non-disabled or non-offender groups. Originality/value -Given the negative implications for treatment that external LOC may play, several significant therapeutic strategies that can contribute to development of internalised LOC are discussed, in addition to a consideration of other possible variables separate from ID that may play a role in both developing or perpetuating an external LOC.

Killing your children to hurt your partner: A South African perspective on the motivations for revenge filicide

“…In both cases 6 and 11 the murdering partner blamed the receiving partner (external locus of control) for their pain and loss of control. Locus of control is the aspect of self‐esteem that relates to the amount of control an individual perceives they have in their life (Raymond & Hayes, 2014). A connection exists between serious crime and an external locus of control.…”

The impact of heuristic availability bias on investmentdecision‐making: Moderated mediation model

“…This, in turn, advances liability for actions and the faith, one can modify the environment or circumstances. While a person who depends upon the domestic locus of control generally attributes a sense of control to the environment, fate, luck, or other external factors (Raymond & Hayes, 2014). The locus of control measures individual changes in ideas that one can control in environmental events, contrary to the ideas that an individual cannot control.…”