1996
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690420310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of macromixing in batch cooling crystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the mass of seeds on particle size was investigated in two simulation papers. Bohlin and Rasmuson [10] concluded that as the mass of seeds increases, the mean size of the final products may increase or decrease; this finding is similar to the results of the present work. In a word, the effect of the mass of seeds may be explained due to the domination of secondary nucleation mechanisms [11].…”
Section: Effect Of Mass Of Seedssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The influence of the mass of seeds on particle size was investigated in two simulation papers. Bohlin and Rasmuson [10] concluded that as the mass of seeds increases, the mean size of the final products may increase or decrease; this finding is similar to the results of the present work. In a word, the effect of the mass of seeds may be explained due to the domination of secondary nucleation mechanisms [11].…”
Section: Effect Of Mass Of Seedssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Given that T was associated with a particular saturated concentration, C *, based on the C vs T solubility curve in Figure a, C * could also be viewed as a decreasing function of time t . The maximum allowable acetaminophen concentration, C , in a well-mixed system as case II, was lower than the one in a nonagitated system as case I at any time t , due to negligible spatial variations in local supersaturation . This was clearly supported by the clearance between the concentration, C , and the calculated saturated concentration, C* , profiles (red and purple dashed curves, Figures and ), representing for the maximum supersaturation, Δ C max = C – C * (i.e., the metastable zone width) at any time, t .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Given that T was associated with a particular saturated concentration, C*, based on the C vs T solubility curve in Figure 2a, C* could also be viewed as a decreasing function of time t. The maximum allowable acetaminophen concentration, C, in a well-mixed system as case II, was lower than the one in a nonagitated system as case I at any time t, due to negligible spatial variations in local supersaturation. 48 This was clearly supported by the clearance between the concentration, C, and the calculated saturated concentration, C*, profiles (red and purple dashed curves, Figures 3 and 4), representing for the maximum supersaturation, ΔC max = C − C* (i.e., the metastable zone width) 49 at any time, t. Unlike the conditions in case II, where the two profiles were overlapped in the early crystallization (red and purple dashed curves in region b, Figure 4), the two profiles in case I were far apart (red and purple dashed curves in region b, Figure 3), indicating that the metastable zone width was much broader in case I at any time, t. Hence, the local ΔC max in case I could get very large and lead to high primary nucleation rates, B°, with many nuclei but insufficient growth, according to the power law relationship: 49…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal agitation is the minimum stirring rate needed to keep all crystal particles suspended from the bottom. Therefore, the size distribution and concentration of particles vary within an agitated suspension according to the dynamical state of the medium [ 46 ]. Stirring rate can affect seriously the tomographic signals by creating disturbances in the medium.…”
Section: Reactive Crystallisation Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stirring rate can affect seriously the tomographic signals by creating disturbances in the medium. Usually swirls are created which affects the signals and subsequently the reconstructions [ 22 , 43 , 46 ]. Assessing the stirring rate of the 20 cm tank, a few different rates of stirring were applied while recording.…”
Section: Reactive Crystallisation Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%