Abstract. A pilot scale field test of non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) removal using high molecular weight alcohols was conducted at Operable Unit 1, Hill Air Force Base, Utah. Petroleum hydrocarbons and spent solvents were disposed of in chemical disposal pits at this site, and these materials are now present in the subsurface in the form of a light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL). This LNAPL is a complex mixture of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, and other compounds. The field experiment was performed in a 5 rn by 3 rn confined test cell, formed by driving interlocking sheet pile walls through the contaminated zone into an underlying clay. The test involved the injection and extraction of about four pore volumes (1 pore volume = 7000 L) of a mixture of 80% tert-butanol and 15% n-hexanol. The contaminants were removed by a combination of NAPL mobilization and enhanced dissolution, and the results of postflood soil coring indicate better than 90% removal of the more soluble contaminants (trichloroethane, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, trimethylbenzene, naphthalene) and 70-80% removal of less soluble compounds (decane and undecane). The results of preflood and postflood NAPL partitioning tracer tests show nearly 80% removal of the total NAPL content from the test cell. The field data suggest that a somewhat higher level of removal could be achieved with a longer alcohol injection.
IntroductionIt is now known that relatively small nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) source zones are capable of producing large contaminated groundwater plumes. While methods such as pumping and treating the contaminated water or funneling the water through reactive walls have been effective for plume control, they do not effectively address the source of the plume. Given that these source zones may continue to release contaminants for many decades or centuries, a large effort is now focused on the development of source zone removal methods. Often these techniques must be applied in situ, owing to the depth of contamination or to the presence of buildings and utilities which prevent excavation. The Rao et al. [1997] field test was performed in an isolated test cell, and it consisted of injecting about nine pore volumes of a 70% ethanol, 12% n-pentanol solution. They reported a bulk NAPL removal of -81%, with a higher removal efficiency for several individual compounds.