1982
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90032-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of preoperative hypertrophy, wall stress and end-systolic dimension as echocardiographic predictors of normalization of left ventricular dilatation after valve replacement in chronic aortic insufficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
4

Year Published

1986
1986
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, these studies do support inclusion of a more precise assessment of LV function in determining the prognosis of patients with chronic severe AR. Previous studies further suggest that contractile function is superior as a predictor of irreversible post-AVR myocardial dysfunction than preoperative LV dimensions or LVEF [15], supporting the likelihood of its utility for clinical outcome prediction. However, contractility has not been previously studied for prediction of survival after AVR for severe AR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, these studies do support inclusion of a more precise assessment of LV function in determining the prognosis of patients with chronic severe AR. Previous studies further suggest that contractile function is superior as a predictor of irreversible post-AVR myocardial dysfunction than preoperative LV dimensions or LVEF [15], supporting the likelihood of its utility for clinical outcome prediction. However, contractility has not been previously studied for prediction of survival after AVR for severe AR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, when symptoms are absent and LVEF is normal at rest, earlier work by us [1] and others [12] suggests that development of clinically evident HF [13], subnormal LVEF at rest or sudden death in the absence of AVR are best predicted by intrinsic myocardial contractility [1,12], which can be measured noninvasively [1]. Though suggested by small studies usually admixing several different valve lesions [14][15][16][17], the post-AVR prognostic utility of preoperative contractility is less well defined. Therefore, among an established cohort of patients with AR who underwent AVR, we aimed to relate postoperative survival to preoperative contractility and to compare the predictive value of this measure with previously established risk predictors [1,8,18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,24,25 LVESVI, which was also decreased with hydralazine (by 28% at 2 years), is an even more powerful predictor of future deterioration in left ventricular performance. [24][25][26][27][28] This may be related to the fact that this variable is an important determinant of left ventricular wall stress,3' a factor that strongly influences left ventricular function in patients with aortic valve disease.28,29A40-42 Whether vasodilator-induced changes in these measurements influence the outcome of patients with chronic aortic insufficiency still must be determined in future studies. Although the need for surgery was not a primary end point because of the limited sample size, it is noteworthy that the number of patients who either required surgery or displayed clinically worrisome reductions in resting EF that might herald the need for valve replacement was substantially greater in the placebo than in the drug group (e.g., 6:35 vs. 1:45).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] These conventional parameters have advantages of comprehensibility and manageability; however, they express dimensions and volumes of the LV or the change of these. Therefore, they are poor at detecting subtle myocardial damage, in that they cannot express LV myocardial behavior.…”
Section: Preoperative Predictor In Chronic Armentioning
confidence: 99%