2016
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.1462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of regional variation in conservation planning: a rangewide example of the Greater Sage‐Grouse

Abstract: Citation: Doherty, K. E., J. S. Evans, P. S. Coates, L. M. Juliusson, and B. C. Fedy. 2016. Importance of regional variation in conservation planning: a rangewide example of the Greater Sage-Grouse. Ecosphere 7(10):e01462. 10.1002/ecs2.1462Abstract. We developed rangewide population and habitat models for Greater Sage-Grouse (Centro cercus urophasianus) that account for regional variation in habitat selection and relative densities of birds for use in conservation planning and risk assessments. We developed a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
154
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
6
154
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Winter resource selection generally occurred irrespective of flock size, but RSFs were still useful in identifying potential WCAs because they occurred in areas that we predicted to have high relative probability of selection. Methods that integrate breeding population indices and resource selection have been successfully used to identify priority areas for sage‐grouse conservation (Coates et al , Doherty et al ). These methods largely relied on spatial relationships between female habitat use during nesting and distance to known occupied leks (Holloran and Anderson , Coates et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winter resource selection generally occurred irrespective of flock size, but RSFs were still useful in identifying potential WCAs because they occurred in areas that we predicted to have high relative probability of selection. Methods that integrate breeding population indices and resource selection have been successfully used to identify priority areas for sage‐grouse conservation (Coates et al , Doherty et al ). These methods largely relied on spatial relationships between female habitat use during nesting and distance to known occupied leks (Holloran and Anderson , Coates et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anthropogenic influence index can also be used to identify areas where targeted management actions, particularly those that reduce access to resource subsidies, could be most effective. To explore this concept, we provide an applied example using existing information about spatial variation in sage‐grouse habitat suitability and breeding populations within our study area (sage‐grouse concentration areas; Coates, Ricca, et al., ; Doherty et al., ). First, we reclassified predicted raven occurrence into four classes (low to high probability).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recommend future research combine our results with other sources of information, particularly those related to bird abundance and stressors affecting abundance, to help define critical habitat. The integration of SDMs and spatially explicit estimates of abundance can be a valuable tool for the identification of priority habitats for species of conservation concern (Thogmartin et al 2014, Doherty et al 2016. Additionally, these surfaces could help inform priority areas for reserve design when combined with other relevant data (Moilanen et al 2005).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%