1975
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4149(75)90013-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of system components and fault tree events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
159
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
159
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some bounds are obtained in [20], and various computation methods can be found, in another context, in [6] and [25]. From now on we restrict our work in proving some properties for the Ω measure, and in giving an axiomatic characterization of it.…”
Section: Example 22 (Example 11 Revisited)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some bounds are obtained in [20], and various computation methods can be found, in another context, in [6] and [25]. From now on we restrict our work in proving some properties for the Ω measure, and in giving an axiomatic characterization of it.…”
Section: Example 22 (Example 11 Revisited)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system availability in stationary state is represented mathematically by the structure function [4,27]:…”
Section: The System Structure Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where BI i is the i-th system component BI measure (20); q i is probability of the i-th system failure (1) and U is the system's unavailability (4). Dynamic Reliability Indices (DRI).…”
Section: Importance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barlow and Proschan [1] introduced in 1975 an index which measures an importance degree for each component. This index is defined by the n-tuple I BP whose kth coordinate (k ∈ [n]) is the probability that the failure of component k causes the system to fail; that is,…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%