2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-016-1446-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importance of tree height and social position for drought-related stress on tree growth and mortality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
3
79
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the extent to which trees are affected by drought is known to be size-dependent (e.g., Zang et al 2012;Bennett et al 2015;Grote et al 2016), directly relating growth and isotope values without accounting for differences in the size distribution of trees used to calculate them could affect results. To address this issue, we developed a statistical model that explicitly accounts for the effect of tree size on growth, and then used the model to estimate the stem growth of a tree of comparable size to that sampled for isotopes for each of the 26 study populations (see below for details).…”
Section: Tree Growth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the extent to which trees are affected by drought is known to be size-dependent (e.g., Zang et al 2012;Bennett et al 2015;Grote et al 2016), directly relating growth and isotope values without accounting for differences in the size distribution of trees used to calculate them could affect results. To address this issue, we developed a statistical model that explicitly accounts for the effect of tree size on growth, and then used the model to estimate the stem growth of a tree of comparable size to that sampled for isotopes for each of the 26 study populations (see below for details).…”
Section: Tree Growth Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trees with inferior social positions may on the one hand benefit from being shaded in dry years, from the reduced water consumption of tall neighbours with isohydric behaviour (Goisser et al 2016), or from their rooting closer to the surface which means better access to occasional rainwater in summer (Flanagan et al 1992). On the other hand, being subdominant may mean less access to water and less stemflow in favour of the roots, limited access to ground water, or less water availability when stocking beside anisohydric neighbours which are continuously exploiting the available water supply (Wullschleger et al 1998;Grote et al 2016). So far, there is no accepted general pattern of how subdominant trees come off under drought in relation to dominant and predominant trees.…”
Section: Relevance For Understanding and Modelling Stand Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growth partitioning in mainly light-limited environments in temperate forests is rather well explored (Pretzsch and Biber 2010), represented in models (Biging and Dobbertin 1995), and applied for silvicultural prescriptions (Kramer 1988;Pretzsch and Zenner 2017). The growth partitioning under water limited conditions is rather far from being well explored and understood (Martínez-Vilalta et al 2012;Grote et al 2016). However, there are many scientific and practical reasons for deeper exploring it in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also crucial for simulating tree mortality in dynamic vegetation models (Meir et al ., ). Predisposing factors are assumed to be related to long‐term climatic stressors (Voltas et al ., ), prevailing long‐term nutrient supply (Gessler et al ., ), water‐use strategies (Hentschel et al ., ), tree height and interspecific and intraspecific competition (Grote et al ., ) and pests, pathogens or air pollution (Allen et al ., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%