Importancia diferencial de los componentes fundamentales de la esquizotipia: un metaanálisis

Fumero, Ascensión; Rodríguez, Manuel González; Roa, Andrea Olmos; Peñate, Wenceslao

doi:10.1016/j.rlp.2016.09.001

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 64 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, a global deﬁnition denotes schizotypy as a unifying construct, representing the underlying vulnerability of SSD psychopathology, and is expressed through a wide range of personality phenomenology and clinical parameters ( Kwapil & Barrantes, 2014 ). However, there are still notable gaps, referring both to its correct definition and to the diagnostic and pathological implications ( Fumero et al, 2017 ), which are able to recognize three characteristic domains used by various approaches, these are the negative/interpersonal, positive/cognitive, and disorganization.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluación en esquizotipia: una revisión sistemática hacia los modelos clínicos y de personalidad

Tapia

2022

Int. j. psychol. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

La investigación alrededor del constructo esquizotipia responde a un campo de extenso desarrollo desde su denominación décadas atrás, que incluye los trastornos del espectro de la esquizofrenia (TEE) y al trastorno de personalidad esquizotípica (TPE), aunque persisten controversias marcadas por la dificultad de establecer consensos definitivos. La necesidad de consolidar los avances en la evaluación de este campo volvió operativa la formulación de esta investigación, se realizó una revisión de la literatura internacional, que contempló 65 trabajos de investigación publicados en la última década (2010-2020). A partir de una síntesis del conocimiento acumulativo, se definieron las herramientas de evaluación válidas y en uso, para su caracterización psicométrica, clínica y de personalidad, además de las implicaciones clínicas encontradas en sus resultados. También se discute el avance de nociones como el continuum de la psicosis y la taxonomía, finalmente se dedica un apartado a un modelo y herramienta multidimensional.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluación en esquizotipia: una revisión sistemática hacia los modelos clínicos y de personalidad

Tapia

2022

Int. j. psychol. res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…ey are: 1) the impairment of social functioning; 2) sensitivity; 3) eccentricity; and 4) peculiarities of cognitive processes. (Chemerinski, Triebwasser, Roussos, & Siever, 2013;Cohen & Lee, 2011;Fumero, Rodríguez, Roa, & Peñate, 2017;Verbeke, De Clerq, Van der Heijden, Hutsebaut, & van Aken, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Study of Oddity in a Russian Clinical Sample

Atadzhykova¹,

Enikolopov²

2021

Psych. Rus.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. At the beginning of 20th century, the phenomenon of oddity began to be studied. It was de!ned as a set of characteristics responsible for an individual giving the impression of being unusual, odd, and peculiar. Later, psychiatrists integrated oddity into the concept of schizotypy. Yet, while considered a part of the schizotypy construct, oddity has remained singular and maintained its status as an independent dimension. Objective. "e present article discusses oddity as a set of particular clinical traits that can be evaluated both by self-report measures and clinical assessment. We set out to investigate the oddity phenomena as manifested in a clinical sample, in order to delineate key features that constitute this concept. Design. Seventy-one patients were selected according to a speci!c set of criteria and subjected to a set of self-report measures (the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire and the Adult Personality Traits Questionnaire), a clinical interview, and a pathopsychological experiment. A number of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional characteristics were analyzed. An intra-group comparison was carried out in order to clarify the potential di#erences between the self-reported and clinically assessed phenomenon of oddity. Results. "e study’s !rst !nding was that the SPQ-74 does not identify odd personalities in the general population, as re$ected in the fact that the sample’s average scores proved to be low. Secondly, restricted emotionality and a de!cit in social interactions proved to be the prevalent characteristics of the sample of “odd” individuals. Furthermore, a set of certain speech peculiarities (word coinage, bizarrerie, etc.) and thinking impairments of various types (distortion of abstraction level and motivational de!cit) emerged as prominent characteristics in the majority of subjects. Finally, it was determined that clinical assessment allows for a more comprehensive evaluation of the psychology of odd personalities than self-report measures, due to a number of the personality, temperamental, and cognitive characteristics that the latter tend to exhibit. Conclusion. “Odd” individuals can be characterized by a number of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral features independent of social perception and relevant to clinical practice; they can be captured more successfully by the application of qualitative methods. Further research is needed to elaborate this set of traits and test this hypothesis on new samples.

show abstract

Importancia diferencial de los componentes fundamentales de la esquizotipia: un metaanálisis

Cited by 2 publications

References 64 publications

Evaluación en esquizotipia: una revisión sistemática hacia los modelos clínicos y de personalidad

Evaluación en esquizotipia: una revisión sistemática hacia los modelos clínicos y de personalidad

A Study of Oddity in a Russian Clinical Sample

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About