Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Reserve and resource estimates and classification are meant to provide reasoned production expectations considering uncertainties and development risks. In conventional fields several estimation methods (volumetric, material balance, analogy, and production trends) can work in tandem in order to provide these reasoned estimates which relate to static and dynamic characterization. Despite intensive efforts to utilize all available data, these estimates could be still inaccurate, but have served our industry well in making business decisions.With the introduction of the unconventional resources, this process requires re-examination and realignment to development priorities, risks, uncertainties and of course production drive mechanics. The early approach in recoverable volume estimation was based heavily on production trends and a statistical appraisal of observed variations with limited relation to production mechanisms and reservoir characteristics. Key work in many disciplines has shown that although production performance does not follow the same static and dynamic trends as in conventional reservoirs, it relates to certain static and dynamic subsurface characteristics particularly to natural fractures. Faults, fairway and background fractures become more important in liquid rich and oil plays (as fluids segregate) and invariably affect the process of hydraulic fracturing and the development of drainage patterns. Since natural fracture network characteristics may change rapidly even across the length of a horizontal well, it is difficult to expect a homogenous performance without the understanding of the natural fracture trends, reservoir characteristics and the change in the respective drive mechanisms. Most commonly used reserve and resource classification methods rely on proximity to existing production. Due to these effects, the expectation of similar performance in infill locations could be diminished. Apart from being an inaccurate prediction, this misconception may lead to the wrong development path in which wells classified as highest ranking may exhibit low performance. In the context of these observations it would be rational to draw fairway maps in relation to key geologic characteristics and dynamic effects utilizing all available information within and around the project area and to provide a basis for analogy which conforms better to the actual production drive mechanisms. In other words, using a physics based reliable technology (fairway maps) we are able to establish undeveloped areas with similar producibility at greater distances than production offset locations with reasonable certainty. Testing the validity of fairway maps with continuous development provides more confidence in predicting offset locations; classifying reserves and resources appropriately and guiding development towards better results. This process provides close alignment between development priorities and certainty levels in reserve and resource estimates which fulfills the basic requirements for rational project management...
Reserve and resource estimates and classification are meant to provide reasoned production expectations considering uncertainties and development risks. In conventional fields several estimation methods (volumetric, material balance, analogy, and production trends) can work in tandem in order to provide these reasoned estimates which relate to static and dynamic characterization. Despite intensive efforts to utilize all available data, these estimates could be still inaccurate, but have served our industry well in making business decisions.With the introduction of the unconventional resources, this process requires re-examination and realignment to development priorities, risks, uncertainties and of course production drive mechanics. The early approach in recoverable volume estimation was based heavily on production trends and a statistical appraisal of observed variations with limited relation to production mechanisms and reservoir characteristics. Key work in many disciplines has shown that although production performance does not follow the same static and dynamic trends as in conventional reservoirs, it relates to certain static and dynamic subsurface characteristics particularly to natural fractures. Faults, fairway and background fractures become more important in liquid rich and oil plays (as fluids segregate) and invariably affect the process of hydraulic fracturing and the development of drainage patterns. Since natural fracture network characteristics may change rapidly even across the length of a horizontal well, it is difficult to expect a homogenous performance without the understanding of the natural fracture trends, reservoir characteristics and the change in the respective drive mechanisms. Most commonly used reserve and resource classification methods rely on proximity to existing production. Due to these effects, the expectation of similar performance in infill locations could be diminished. Apart from being an inaccurate prediction, this misconception may lead to the wrong development path in which wells classified as highest ranking may exhibit low performance. In the context of these observations it would be rational to draw fairway maps in relation to key geologic characteristics and dynamic effects utilizing all available information within and around the project area and to provide a basis for analogy which conforms better to the actual production drive mechanisms. In other words, using a physics based reliable technology (fairway maps) we are able to establish undeveloped areas with similar producibility at greater distances than production offset locations with reasonable certainty. Testing the validity of fairway maps with continuous development provides more confidence in predicting offset locations; classifying reserves and resources appropriately and guiding development towards better results. This process provides close alignment between development priorities and certainty levels in reserve and resource estimates which fulfills the basic requirements for rational project management...
Recent advancements in well design and completion technology have been tested in unconventional resource plays with wide variety of results. This paper discusses the evolution and performance analysis of the different well designs in a tight unconventional oil play in North America. A brief description is given of the different chronological well types in the play (i.e. standard horizontal wells, multi-lateral wells, and extended reach horizontal wells). The performance of such advanced wells is analyzed. The flow regimes encountered around multi-lateral and extended reach horizontal wells are described using diagnostic plots of time rate and pressure (TRP) data. These regimes are related to Arps exponent b-factor. So far, there is little information of such flow regimes or the ranges of b-factor for multi-lateral wells in tight unconventional plays. In multi-lateral and extended reach horizontal wells, a period of frac water cleaning may be seen at the initial production. Apparent early bilinear or linear flow regimes might be observed afterwards. In this tight oil play, later multi-phase effects dominate the flow regimes and cause deviations from the early bilinear and linear flow. Late second linear flow regime is not seen in the analyzed data of standard horizontal wells, multi-lateral wells, or extended reach horizontal wells. In this play, multi-phase effects cause late time lower b-factor. In many instances, late time b-factor is lower than 1. This work emphasizes on the reserves estimation of these modern wells in this play. Extended reach horizontal wells have shown better late time b-factor and normalized Initial Production of 90 days "IP90" per lateral length compared to multi-lateral wells. This might give an indication of the higher completion efficiency in the extended reach horizontal wells. Based on this work, Extended reach horizontal wells have higher Estimated Ultimate Recovery "EUR" compared to both multi-lateral and standard horizontal wells. Development of unconventional plays by drilling longer single lateral horizontal wells while reducing the inter frac stages spacing is becoming the norm. This work helps to decipher the performance of multi-lateral and extended reach wells in unconventional plays. This leads to improving the development concepts and reserves evaluation methods of these modern wells in unconventional formations.
The scope of this work is to assess the flow beyond boundary-dominated flow, defining the existence of a third flow regime (after transient linear flow and boundary-dominated flow) that we call "exterior flow" for further use in decline curve analysis in unconventional reservoirs. Thus, exterior flow is defined as the linear flow of gas from the non-stimulated matrix feeding into the edges of the depleted stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), at late times, far away (predicted by Lee 2021; and anticipated by Marder et al. 2021). Sometimes referred as "flow beyond the tips" or post-SRV flow (Blasingame 2019). Because of the existence of this third flow regime, the production curves of over-pressured shale gas reservoirs, such as the Haynesville formation, seem to not be fitted by a single hyperbolic model or any of the modern rate-time relations (Power law exponential, Stretched exponential, Duong, etc.). We believe that the over-pressured condition of the formation—close to the lithostatic gradient in the Haynesville Shale for example—yields such high pressure drawdowns that all flow regimes (transient linear flow, boundary-dominated flow, and exterior flow) occur sooner compared to other basins. Additionally, this paper shows that a new member of the logistic growth family of curves, called the "modified Logistic Growth Model" in its 2023 version (m-LGM 2023) solves the problem of curve-fitting production data from horizontal wells in the Haynesville Shale. Furthermore, two novel diagnostic plots are presented for rate-time analysis to obtain the characteristic time of switching from boundary-dominated to exterior flow, which enables the prediction of additional volume to be produced under this flow regime. Finally, given that the current literature of the SPE-PRMS 2022 does not provide specific guidelines for the categorization of probable reserves (P2) in shale gas, we believe this work could signify a contribution for future reserves using this category for unconventional formations. The volume expected from exterior flow could be justified as probable reserves (P2) in shale gas wells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.