Proceedings of 2011 International Symposium on VLSI Design, Automation and Test 2011
DOI: 10.1109/vdat.2011.5783603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Important test selection for screening potential customer returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tests with the highest distances will be chosen for the final multivariate technique in that reduced space [6,7]. This method presents the major disadvantage to need this first bivariate analysis.…”
Section: Test Selection By Outlying Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests with the highest distances will be chosen for the final multivariate technique in that reduced space [6,7]. This method presents the major disadvantage to need this first bivariate analysis.…”
Section: Test Selection By Outlying Rankingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that multivariate outlier analysis was more robust and effective at screening customer returns than traditional test limits. In [8], it was found that test selection is a critical step in the learning for screening customer returns. A methodology was suggested that leveraged various test selection algorithms to improve the ability to screen returns.…”
Section: Prior Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…outlier models. To apply multivariate test analysis, one challenge is to select the relevant combinations of tests to use [8]. This is necessary when there are many parametric tests, potentially over 1000, and the possible test combinations can be enormous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For predicting customer returns, the works in [7], [8] apply test selection when learning from an extremely imbalanced dataset, where the imbalance was on the order of 10k vs. 1, i.e. 10k passing parts versus 1 failing part.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%