Imported malaria in an area in southern Madrid, 2005-2008

Abstract

BackgroundIn Spain, malaria cases are mostly due to migrants and travellers returning from endemic areas. The objective of this work was to describe the malaria cases diagnosed at the Severo Ochoa University Hospital (HUSO) in Leganés in the south of the Madrid Region from 2005 to 2008.MethodsDescriptive retrospective study performed at HUSO. Data sources are registries from the Microbiology Department and malaria cases notified to the Preventive Medicine Department. Analysed parameters were: administrative, demographical, related to the stay at the endemic country, clinical, microbiological diagnosis method, pregnancy, treatment and prophylaxis, co-infections, and days of hospital stay.ResultsFifty-seven patients diagnosed with malaria were studied. Case distribution per year was 13 in 2005, 15 in 2006, 15 in 2007 and 14 in 2008. Thirty-three patients were female (57.9%) and 24 male (42.1%). Mean age was 27.8 years. Most of the malaria cases were acquired in Nigeria (49.1%) and Equatorial Guinea (32.7%). 29.1% of the patients were immigrants who had arrived recently, and 61.8% acquired malaria when travelling to their countries of origin to visit friends and relatives (VFR). Majority of cases were diagnosed between June and September. Microscopy was positive in 39 cases (68.4%) immunochromatography in 42 (73.7%) and PCR in the 55 cases where performed. Plasmodium falciparum was responsible for 94.7% of the cases. The more frequent symptoms were fever (77.2%), followed by headache and gastrointestinal symptoms (33.3%). Nine cases needed hospital admittance, a pregnant woman, three children, four VFR and an African tourist, but all evolved favourably. Chemoprophylaxis data was known from 55 patients. It was taken correctly in one case (1.8%), in five (9.1%) the prophylaxis was improper while the others 49 (89.1%) cases had not followed any anti-malarial prophylaxis.ConclusionsChildren, pregnant women and the VFR have the highest risk to present severe malaria and to need hospital admittance. Another important risk factor for acquiring malaria is incorrect prophylaxis. The first place for malaria acquisition was Nigeria and the main species causing malaria was P. falciparum.

Imported malaria in Belgrade, Serbia, between 2001 and 2009

“…Th e causative agent remained undetected in six cases, presumably due to a very low parasitemia, which was either below the gold-standard threshold of 20-50 parasites /μL or may have been missed due to the generally very low number of malaria patients in Serbia and consequent inexperience of the parasitologists who performed the analysis. In addition, the fact that parasitological diagnosis was performed only by microscopic and not molecular means may also explain the absence of asymptomatic patients in our series, a fi nding quite diff erent from other studies in which 16% [14] and even one third [15] of the patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. To increase diagnostic sensitivity in such submicroscopic cases, as well as in asymptomatic patients who may be carriers, PCR for Plasmodium should be performed in all cases of negative thick smears.…”

Imported malaria in Finland 2003-2011: prospective nationwide data with rechecked background information

“…Most (95%) of those with malaria were treated as in-patients; this proportion is higher than reported from other centres (16-78%) [8-10] . In Europe the national guidelines and practices differ from each other in this respect [5] .…”

Imported malaria including HIV and pregnant woman risk groups: overview of the case of a Spanish city 2004–2014

“…Immigrant a foreigner who has recently arrived in Spain (within the last year) with no subsequent travel to his/her country [ 8 ].…”