2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2018.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imprecise Monte Carlo simulation and iterative importance sampling for the estimation of lower previsions

Abstract: We develop a theoretical framework for studying numerical estimation of lower previsions, generally applicable to two-level Monte Carlo methods, importance sampling methods, and a wide range of other sampling methods one might devise. We link consistency of these estimators to Glivenko-Cantelli classes, and for the sub-Gaussian case we show how the correlation structure of this process can be used to bound the bias and prove consistency. We also propose a new upper estimator, which can be used along with the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peng et al (2018)) developed a nonparametric uncertainty representation method with different insufficient data from two sources. Troffaes (2018)) further proposed an imprecise MC simulation and iterative importance sampling for the estimation of lower previsions. Fetz (2019)) improved the convergence of iterative importance sampling for computing upper and lower expectations.…”
Section: Modern MC Methods For Uqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al (2018)) developed a nonparametric uncertainty representation method with different insufficient data from two sources. Troffaes (2018)) further proposed an imprecise MC simulation and iterative importance sampling for the estimation of lower previsions. Fetz (2019)) improved the convergence of iterative importance sampling for computing upper and lower expectations.…”
Section: Modern MC Methods For Uqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 is now being performed on a continuous function, even if the performance function used is not smooth, or if a set of performance functions are being analysed. [30] shows that importance sampling results in a consistent estimator when the failure probability is continuous in the epistemic uncertain parameters.…”
Section: Approach 3: Metamodels For Non-naïve Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All the variables are assumed to be independent with respect to each other and the probability distributions associated with each of them are listed in Table 1. The mean values of a and t, are modeled as interval variables, i.e., θ 1 = µ a ∈ [11,13] and θ 2 = µ t ∈ [13,15], respectively. Note that the distributions of those parameters that must be positive due to physical reasons, i.e., a, t, b and h, are truncated such that no samples with negative values are generated.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, series expansion methods have been introduced (see e.g., [9], [10]) to approximate the epistemic uncertain parameters via series expansion or orthogonal polynomial expansion schemes (see e.g., [11]), or Chebyshev polynomial based schemes such as presented in [12]. For a more rigorous analysis of Monte Carlo methods for propagating imprecise probabilities, the reader is referred to [13,14]. However, due to assumptions on the local nature of the solution manifold around the expansion point, these methods are often limited to small-to-moderate levels of epistemic uncertainty [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%