2011
DOI: 10.1002/app.33646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impregnation of poly(L‐lactide‐ran‐cyclic carbonate) copolymers with useful compounds with supercritical carbon dioxide

Abstract: In this article, we cover the development of L-lactide (L-LA) random copolymers into which useful compounds, such as repellents and antibacterial agents, were impregnated by high concentration. Outstanding controlled release materials were developed with statistical random copolymers of L-LA with cyclic carbonate (CC) [2,2-dimethyltrimethylene carbonate (2,2-DTMC) or tetramethylene carbonate (TEMC)] with tin 2-ethyL-hexanoate as a catalyst at 150 C (2,2-DTMC) or 120 C (TEMC) for 24 h without solvent. The prepa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cause is thought to be that T m and ΔH m of poly(L-LA-ran-TEMC) are lower than that of poly (L-LA-ran-CL). In a previous study, it has reported that T m and ΔH m affect the maintenance of form and content [21] [22]. The above results showed that the differences in oil content in poly(L-LA-ran-CL) and poly(L-LA-ran-TEMC) resulted from the effect of pressure.…”
Section: Effect Of Pressure On Impregnation Of Poly(l-la) Random Copomentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cause is thought to be that T m and ΔH m of poly(L-LA-ran-TEMC) are lower than that of poly (L-LA-ran-CL). In a previous study, it has reported that T m and ΔH m affect the maintenance of form and content [21] [22]. The above results showed that the differences in oil content in poly(L-LA-ran-CL) and poly(L-LA-ran-TEMC) resulted from the effect of pressure.…”
Section: Effect Of Pressure On Impregnation Of Poly(l-la) Random Copomentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Although T m and -ΔH m of poly(L-LA) were 169.3˚C and 32.0 J/g before processing, respectively, T m and −ΔH m decreased with an extension of processing time and were 166.7˚C and 27.1 J/g, respectively, for 3 h. T m (166.0˚C) of the [34]. In our pre-vious report, in order to evaluate the relationship between T m or ΔH m and content, we synthesized various L-LA copolymers with different T m and ΔH m , and investigated the difference in content [21] [22]. In the previous work, it appeared that the content of poly(L-LA-ran-TEMC) (81/19) (T m 97.9˚C and -ΔH m 5.1 J/g), which was lower than T m and -ΔH m (157.0˚C and 36.0 J/g) of poly(L-LA-ran-CL) (85/15), was higher than that of poly(L-LAran-CL).…”
Section: Effect Of Processing Time On Impregnation Of Poly(l-la) Randmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tsutsumi et al [60] reported results on the synthesis of biodegradable copolymer Poly(L-lactide-ran-cyclic carbonate) and its impregnation with d-limonene as an antibacterial agent. Outstanding controlled release materials were developed with statistical random copolymers of L-lactide (L-LA) with cyclic carbonate (CC) (2,2-dimethyltrimethylene carbonate (2,2-DTMC) or tetramethylene carbonate (TEMC)).…”
Section: Impregnation Of Polymeric Forms Other Than Textiles and Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controlled‐release materials can be obtained by impregnating biodegradable polymers, using scCO 2 to soften the polymers at low temperatures . CO 2 has a critical temperature of 31.1°C and a critical pressure of 7.38 MPa, such that scCO 2 can be readily generated for the processing of polymers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%