2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-009-0971-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impression Creep of a Lead-Free Sn-1.7Sb-1.5Ag Solder Reinforced by Submicron-Size Al2O3 Particles

Abstract: In the present study, the Sn-1.7Sb-1.5Ag solder alloy and the same material reinforced with 5 vol.% of 0.3-lm Al 2 O 3 particles were synthesized using the powder metallurgy route of blending, compaction, sintering, and extrusion. The impression creep behavior of both monolithic and composite solders was studied under a constant punching stress in the range of 20 MPa to 110 MPa, at temperatures in the range of 320 K to 430 K. The creep resistance of the composite solder was higher than that of the monolithic a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of resultant lines according to sergeant-Ashby model is À1/n. The stress exponent values are in the range of 4.3-5.9 depending on the composition of used alloys and that agrees with the previous results (n ¼4.5 [24] and n ¼5.3-5.6 [42]. According to the powerlaw creep, a decrease in stress exponent would result in an increase in creep rate due to a decrease in yield strength [43,44].…”
Section: Indentation Creepsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The slope of resultant lines according to sergeant-Ashby model is À1/n. The stress exponent values are in the range of 4.3-5.9 depending on the composition of used alloys and that agrees with the previous results (n ¼4.5 [24] and n ¼5.3-5.6 [42]. According to the powerlaw creep, a decrease in stress exponent would result in an increase in creep rate due to a decrease in yield strength [43,44].…”
Section: Indentation Creepsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The slope of the resultant lines Table 7. These exponent values are in the range of 2.16 to 5.75 depending on the composition of used alloy and that agreed with the pervious results (n= 4.5 [19] and n ~ 5.3 to 5.6 and 5.8 to 5.9 [20]. The change in stress exponent values are attributable to microstructural features (changing in  matrix such as change in the lattice parameters, solid solution, size and distribution of strengthening phases, intermetallic phases) and that is agree with the pervious results [21].…”
Section: Creep Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…x alloys which calculated using Mulheam-Tabor method are given in Table 24. These exponent values are in the range of 2.16 to 3.07 depending on the composition of alloy and that agreed with the pervious results [31,32]. The change in stress exponent values are…”
Section: Thermal Propertiessupporting
confidence: 91%