2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impression creep technique—An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exercise would help to predict the weakest spot of the component or material system under a complex situation. considering the yield stress and ultimate strength value of the test material (Sastry 2005;Udayaprasanna 2009). A higher testing temperature also will enhance the creep rate, and tests conducted at different temperatures will enable the investigator to find the stress exponent values (Mahmudi and Geranmayeh 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exercise would help to predict the weakest spot of the component or material system under a complex situation. considering the yield stress and ultimate strength value of the test material (Sastry 2005;Udayaprasanna 2009). A higher testing temperature also will enhance the creep rate, and tests conducted at different temperatures will enable the investigator to find the stress exponent values (Mahmudi and Geranmayeh 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the impression creep test [23] where the creep properties are related to the small volume of material close to the contact region between the specimen and the loading device, the TBSwas designed to be able to obtain creep properties from the overall specimen creep deformation; not just from the localised deformation which occurs in the contact area between the loading pins and the loading pins supporting material. In order to make a suitable choice of specimen dimension ratios, with minimum localized deformation in the contact areas, the FE analyses results presented in  is the total TBS deformation rate measured at the loading pins.…”
Section: Recommended Specimen Dimension Ratio Rangesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence a constant stress cannot be maintained with penetration of the indenter. The drawback can be overcome by impression creep testing method where a uniform cross section indenter is used under uniaxial compression [5]. The main advantages of IC are: (i) the small sample size requirement, (ii) creep behavior of different zones similar to that of weld zones can be determined, (iii) the test process takes very less time and (iv) the data can be used for modeling the creep deformation of emerging materials [6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%