2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2017.03.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imprimitive permutations in primitive groups

Abstract: The goal of this paper is to study primitive groups that are contained in the union of maximal (in the symmetric group) imprimitive groups. The study of types of permutations inside primitive groups goes back to the origins of the theory of permutation groups. However, this is another instance of a situation common in mathematics in which a very natural problem turns out to be extremely difficult. Fortunately, the enormous progresses of the last few decades seem to allow a new momentum on the attack to this pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To complete the proof, we may assume r ∈ H. To handle the case r = 13, we use random search in Magma to show that γ u (G) = 2 (we refer the reader to [18, Section 1.2.4] for further details of the computation). For example, one can check that { (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13), (1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,12,7,11,10,13)} is a TDS for Γ(G). For r ∈ {17, 31} we can use Lemma 2.5 to show that γ u (G) = 2.…”
Section: And Only If One Of the Following Holdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To complete the proof, we may assume r ∈ H. To handle the case r = 13, we use random search in Magma to show that γ u (G) = 2 (we refer the reader to [18, Section 1.2.4] for further details of the computation). For example, one can check that { (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13), (1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9,12,7,11,10,13)} is a TDS for Γ(G). For r ∈ {17, 31} we can use Lemma 2.5 to show that γ u (G) = 2.…”
Section: And Only If One Of the Following Holdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, n Á 2 mod 4; hence n is not a power of 2 and we do not have affine subgroups. Finally, .1 4 ; n 4/ D .2 2 ; n 4/ 2 fixes at least 4 points; hence it does not belong to PGL 2 .p/ by Lemma 2.11 (2). This concludes the proof in case n Á 2 mod 4.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorems 13 and 14mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Assume then that 4 is a partial sum in c.x/. The unique possibility is c.x/ D .4; : : :/, from which 1 ¤ x 4 fixes an even number of points greater than 3, from which x … PL 2 .q/ by Lemma 2.11 (2).…”
Section: Proof Of Theorems 13 and 14mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first results in this section we use the language of cycle sets. We start with some easy consequences of Theorem 2.4 and the results of [2]. Theorem 3.1.…”
Section: Decomposition Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%