1992
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.18.8852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improbability of effective vaccination against human immunodeficiency virus because of its intracellular transmission and rectal portal of entry.

Abstract: The worldwide effort to produce a vaccine against AIDS continues to disregard the fact that even human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-specific neutralizing antibodies and cell-mediated immunity are ineffective against virus within cells without viral antigens on the cell membrane--and that much of HIV infection is transmitted in this manner. According to a recent report, a simian immunodeficiency virus vaccine that protected monkeys against an intravenous challenge with cell-free virus was, as predicted, ineffec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the probability has been questioned for HIV [8], and results from SIV infection of macaques have shown that in this model it is not [7]. Recent work has suggested that natural TBEV infection via tick bite leads to viraemia by means of infected cells rather than free virus particles [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the probability has been questioned for HIV [8], and results from SIV infection of macaques have shown that in this model it is not [7]. Recent work has suggested that natural TBEV infection via tick bite leads to viraemia by means of infected cells rather than free virus particles [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With tick-transmitted TBEV infection being introduced into the circulation by TBEV-infected cells rather than free virus particles, the meaning of results obtained by experimental syringe inoculation of free virus in relation to natural infection may be questioned. This even more so, as experiments on antibody-mediated protection, known to be effective against syringe inoculation of simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) into macaques, could not be reproduced when virusinfected cells were applied for challenge [7], and the possibilities of antibodies being able to protect against virus challenge when contracted in the form of infected cells in general was questioned [8]. In the current study we investigated the capacity of TBEV antibodies to protect mice from challenge with TBEV-infected cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to produce experimental anti-HIV vaccines often fail to consider that HIV may enter the body carried within cells as well as in a cell-free state [24]. With the introduction of semen large numbers of lymphocytes are also brought into contact with the rectal mucosa.…”
Section: Implications Of M Cell Viral Uptake For Hiv Immunizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the virus is sequestered in the form of virus-infected cells, viruses may be able to avoid internal lines of defence, leading to the potential for virus-infected cells to spread infection (Levy, 1988;Sabin, 1991Sabin, , 1992. Few if any studies are available which directly address the problem of whether virus-infected ceils are efficient vehicles for infection delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LDV transmission has implications for the study of sexually transmitted disease as well as vaccination against sexually transmitted viruses which may travel in cells (Levy, 1988;Sabin, 1991Sabin, , 1992 …”
Section: != Ii!ii : I I I! Iiii I I I I I Iiiii I Iiiiiiiii ;Iii !Iiimentioning
confidence: 99%