Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also possible molecular interferences are be dissociated in the stripper. Details of the AMS measurement procedure can be referred in [13]. Natural Cl content in rock was calculated by conventional isotope dilution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also possible molecular interferences are be dissociated in the stripper. Details of the AMS measurement procedure can be referred in [13]. Natural Cl content in rock was calculated by conventional isotope dilution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We begin by summarising instrumental aspects of SUERC 36 Cl measurement that are already published [2,6]. First, negative ions towards the positively-biased terminal where they are passed through a thin gas and become positively charged.…”
Section: Suerc 36 CL Accelerator Mass Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the challenge in 36 Cl AMS is to separate the 36 Cl signal from the interfering isobar 36 S. This can be done efficiently in a multi anode gas ionisation chamber as discussed in our earlier work [2,6]. Essential for good separation of 36 Cl and 36 S ions at low ion energies is to use thin and uniform detector window (30 nm silicon rich nitride membrane 10 Â 10 mm) [7,8] and to discriminate against scattered ions.…”
Section: Measurement Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the last decade, significant progress has been made in isobar separation using gas counters. The AMS laboratories SUERC [33] (30 MeV, 5 MV, 5+) and VERA [34,35] (24 MeV,3 MV, 7+) have demonstrated that without a degrader foil low background ( 36 Cl/Cl > 10 À15 ) can be obtained with much higher yields (4-10 times larger), which makes measuring time much shorter and more efficient. Such high yields will never be possible with the degrader foil technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%