2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2007.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved alkaline comet assay protocol for adherent HaCaT keratinocytes to study UVA-induced DNA damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The alkaline comet assay was performed either directly after irradiation or after a recovery of 2 or 4 h in complete culture medium, according to Wischermann et al (2007). The neutral comet assay was performed directly after irradiation according to the protocols described by Olive and Banath (Olive et al, 1993).…”
Section: Alkaline and Neutral Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alkaline comet assay was performed either directly after irradiation or after a recovery of 2 or 4 h in complete culture medium, according to Wischermann et al (2007). The neutral comet assay was performed directly after irradiation according to the protocols described by Olive and Banath (Olive et al, 1993).…”
Section: Alkaline and Neutral Comet Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability for UVA radiation to generate SSBs and/or alkali‐labile lesions as minor classes of DNA damage has been demonstrated in Chinese ovary cells and human monocytes using the alkaline elution technique, agarose gel electrophoresis or the alkaline comet assay . Similar types of DNA lesions have been shown to be produced in adherent human keratinocytes (HaCaT) that have been exposed to UVA radiation using an improved version of the alkaline comet . As an illustration of the low efficiency for UVA to cleave cellular DNA, it was found that an exposure to a dose of 100 kJ m −2 of UVA radiation was able to increase the tail moment value from 1.91 up to 2.66 in relative units.…”
Section: Uva Radiation‐mediated Oxidation Reactions To Cellular Dnamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, researchers have used a wide variety of solutions for UV illumination, ranging from home solarium lamps to state-of-the-art solar simulators. By far the most common source of UV light is a lamp with one or more fluorescent tubes [10][11][12][13][14], ranging from simple hand-held lamps [14] or home solariums [10] to UV-crosslinkers [12] and therapeutic illuminators designed for medical use [13]. The second most common type of UV light sources for medical research are solar simulators [15][16][17], which usually employ a high-power Xenon arc lamp with an optical output spectrum very similar to that of natural sunlight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even fluorescent tubes, which are still among the more efficient light sources, emit approximately 90% of their energy in the form of heat [18]. Researchers combat the problem of excessive heat dissipation with ventilation [10], ice blocks [11], cooling blocks connected to a thermostated bath [16], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%