2016
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved analysis of micro‐ and nanomole‐scale sulfur multi‐isotope compositions by gas source isotope ratio mass spectrometry

Abstract: The analysis of the three S-isotope ratios on the SF6 molecule using the so-called conventional fluorination method and dual-inlet ion ratio mass spectrometry is reliable for sample sizes down to ~20 nanomoles. Despite being close to the theoretical limits for maintaining the viscous flow regime of gas in the capillary, errors were not limited by counting statistics, but probably relate to sample gas purification. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
7
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No further corrections were carried out, other than normalization of the data to CDT. Δ 33 S and Δ 36 S IAEA-standards were within values reported elsewhere (Labidi et al, 2012;Defouilloy et al, 2016;Au Yang et al, 2016). Our analysis (n = 8) of IAEA-S1 standard yielded: δ 34 S = -0.29 ± 0.04‰, Δ 33 S = 0.080 ± 0.010‰ and Δ 36 S = -0.852 ± 0.085‰ vs CDT.…”
Section: Sulfur Multi-isotope Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
“…No further corrections were carried out, other than normalization of the data to CDT. Δ 33 S and Δ 36 S IAEA-standards were within values reported elsewhere (Labidi et al, 2012;Defouilloy et al, 2016;Au Yang et al, 2016). Our analysis (n = 8) of IAEA-S1 standard yielded: δ 34 S = -0.29 ± 0.04‰, Δ 33 S = 0.080 ± 0.010‰ and Δ 36 S = -0.852 ± 0.085‰ vs CDT.…”
Section: Sulfur Multi-isotope Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Δ 36 S = -0.970 ± 0.277 ‰ vs V-CDT. All values are within the ranges of δ 34 S, Δ 33 S, Δ 36 S accepted or measured by other laboratories for these international standards (Au Yang et al, 2016;Farquhar et al, 2007b;Labidi et al, 2014;Ono et al, 2006b). Analysis of the international sulfate standard NBS-127 was also performed and gave a δ 34 S of 20.8 ± 0.4 ‰ (2σ; n=12), consistent with the 20.3 ± 0.4 ‰ value reported by the IAEA.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…China and California result from stratospheric fallout of SO 2 (with ∆ 33 S potentially up to +10 ‰ higher; Ono et al (2013)), which underwent UV photolysis by short wavelength (Au Yang et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2018a;Lin et al, 2018b;Romero and Thiemens, 2003). This suggestion primarily relies on the similarities between ∆ 33 S-∆ 36 S values of sulfate aerosols and laboratory experiments of SO 2 photolysis conducted at different wavelengths…”
Section: A New Oxidation Pathway Implying Magnetic Isotope Effect 455mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the IAEA-S3 (n = 8) gave the following: δ 34 S = −32.44 ± 0.30 ‰, 33 S = 0.069±0.023 ‰, and 36 S = −0.970±0.277 ‰ vs. V-CDT. All values are within the ranges of δ 34 S, 33 S, and 36 S accepted or measured by other laboratories for these international standards (Au Yang et al, 2016;Farquhar et al, 2007b;Labidi et al, 2014;Ono et al, 2006b;Geng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Samplessupporting
confidence: 58%