2003
DOI: 10.1054/clnu.2002.0617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved assessment of body cell mass by segmental bioimpedance analysis in malnourished subjects and acromegaly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another possibility is that combinations of segmental measurements may improve prediction of whole-body components in some conditions. Pirlich et al (2003) investigated the value of segmental BIA for body cell mass (BCM) estimation in malnourished subjects and acromegaly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility is that combinations of segmental measurements may improve prediction of whole-body components in some conditions. Pirlich et al (2003) investigated the value of segmental BIA for body cell mass (BCM) estimation in malnourished subjects and acromegaly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on lean body mass using total-body potassium (TBK) measurements, a more reliable method for assessing body cell mass, have been conflicting in acromegaly. Pirlich et al [35] evaluated body cell mass in 18 subjects with acromegaly and did not detect differences in TBK and body cell mass versus controls. In a study by Landin et al [36] of nine acromegalic patients, surgical resection of a GH-secreting adenoma was associated with a reduction in body cell mass as measured by TBK.…”
Section: Lean Body Massmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Only one study published segmental Xc values at 100 kHz (Bracco et al 1996) and no study used 5 kHz. Data on segmental PA at 50 kHz were not included in the table because there were only three studies present (Zillikens et al 1992;Bracco et al 1996;Pirlich et al 2003). Most studies used a technique comparable to T1 of the present study.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Studies By Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, electrode sites on the hip varied. Some authors (present study, Bracco et al 1996;Pirlich et al 2003) applied the definition of Fuller and Elia (1989), where the sensing electrode is situated anterior to the iliac crest. Others Baumgartner et al 1989;Zillikens et al 1992;Woodrow et al 1996Woodrow et al , 1997Zhu et al 1999Zhu et al , 2000 followed the definition of Chumlea et al (1988), where the sensing electrode is located on the level of the gluteal crease.…”
Section: Comparisons With Other Studies By Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%