2019
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2019.2922453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Assessment of Muscle Excitation From Surface Electromyograms in Isometric Muscle Contractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the impact of MUAPs needs to be removed from muscle excitation estimation. In this study, we tested two different MUAP removal techniques, namely full HDEMG decomposition to contributions of individual MUs and CAI technique proposed in [10]. Full HDEMG decomposition supports exact control of the quality, removes all impacts of noise and MUAPs from muscle estimation, but is also highly selective, as only reliably identified MUs are considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the impact of MUAPs needs to be removed from muscle excitation estimation. In this study, we tested two different MUAP removal techniques, namely full HDEMG decomposition to contributions of individual MUs and CAI technique proposed in [10]. Full HDEMG decomposition supports exact control of the quality, removes all impacts of noise and MUAPs from muscle estimation, but is also highly selective, as only reliably identified MUs are considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same experimental setup, CKC-based MU identification required 19.54 ± 8.37 s per one second of HDEMG signals. Detailed analysis of the computational complexity of CST, CAI and RMS metrics is provided in [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Different approaches to muscle activation estimation from MU discharge patterns were also developed, including Principal Component Analysis of smoothed MU discharge rates (Negro et al, 2009), NMF of smoothed MU discharge rates (Tanzarella et al, 2021) and Cumulative Spike Train (CST) of identified MUs (Farina et al, 2014). Indeed, studies of simultaneous MU behavior in different muscles are increasing (Héroux et al, 2014;de Souza et al, 2018;Kranjec and Holobar, 2019;Davis et al, 2020;Potočnik et al, 2020;Cohen et al, 2021;Tanzarella et al, 2021). However, to the best of our knowledge, comparisons of MU behavior in a group of simultaneously recorded skeletal muscles of older and young persons are still largely lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%