2022
DOI: 10.3934/mbe.2022437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved bat algorithm for roundness error evaluation problem

Abstract: <abstract> <p>In the production and processing of precision shaft-hole class parts, the wear of cutting tools, machine chatter, and insufficient lubrication can lead to changes in their roundness, which in turn affects the overall performance of the relevant products. To improve the accuracy of roundness error assessments, Bat algorithm (BA) is applied to roundness error assessments. An improved bat algorithm (IBA) is proposed to counteract the original lack of variational mechanisms, which can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first-order harmonic component is caused by the installation eccentricity of the measured part, and the first-order harmonic component is suppressed just to eliminate the influence of the eccentricity error on the roundness error, so that the least-squares circle center of the separated obtained roundness error automatically coincides with the origin of the measurement coordinate system, and the evaluation of the roundness error is more convenient. As shown in figure 9(a), the measured roundness profile curve and the set roundness profile curve are in good agreement, and the simulated roundness error without the first-order harmonics is 10.2322 µm by the error evaluation [22], and the measured roundness error value is 10.2292 µm, with a relative error of 0.029%, as shown in table 2.…”
Section: Separation Of Shape Errorsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The first-order harmonic component is caused by the installation eccentricity of the measured part, and the first-order harmonic component is suppressed just to eliminate the influence of the eccentricity error on the roundness error, so that the least-squares circle center of the separated obtained roundness error automatically coincides with the origin of the measurement coordinate system, and the evaluation of the roundness error is more convenient. As shown in figure 9(a), the measured roundness profile curve and the set roundness profile curve are in good agreement, and the simulated roundness error without the first-order harmonics is 10.2322 µm by the error evaluation [22], and the measured roundness error value is 10.2292 µm, with a relative error of 0.029%, as shown in table 2.…”
Section: Separation Of Shape Errorsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…For roundness, Wen et al [34] proposed the use of a genetic algorithm (GA) for the evaluation of the minimum-zone circle, but the genetic algorithm requires the adjustment of numerous parameters. Recently, Li et al [35] proposed an improved bat algorithm (BA) to achieve accurate evaluation of minimum-zone roundness. In addition, the application of a genetic algorithm [10] and an improved cuckoo search (CS) [36] algorithm to flatness has been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%