1993
DOI: 10.4102/sajbm.v24i4.872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved beta estimation on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange: A simulation study

Abstract: In this article we focus on beta estimation in the thinly-traded environment of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE). We build on existing literature by evaluating a beta estimation procedure known as the trade-to-trade which has not until now been considered in the context of the JSE. We contrast our results with two known estimation procedures, i.e. the Cohen et al. and the traditional ordinary least squares (OLS). The trade-to-trade methodology, the estimator proposed by Cohen et al. and OLS are objectivel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SW method did not eliminate the problem of the downwards bias, when calculated with a daily periodicity, but did not present, for the average beta, a significant bias with weekly and monthly periodicity. This result is in line with that obtained by Bowie and Bradfield (1993), which, simulating monthly returns for the non-liquid series, show that the TT method produces a beta estimator superior to that obtained by the method of Cohen et. al.…”
Section: Final Considerationssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SW method did not eliminate the problem of the downwards bias, when calculated with a daily periodicity, but did not present, for the average beta, a significant bias with weekly and monthly periodicity. This result is in line with that obtained by Bowie and Bradfield (1993), which, simulating monthly returns for the non-liquid series, show that the TT method produces a beta estimator superior to that obtained by the method of Cohen et. al.…”
Section: Final Considerationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…(Brooks, 2001: Dimson (1979) simulated data according to eq. 3, Bowie and Bradfield (1993) simulated data according to eq. 6, and this paper simulated data according to eq.…”
Section: Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%