2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep38198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved bi-allelic modification of a transcriptionally silent locus in patient-derived iPSC by Cas9 nickase

Abstract: Homology directed repair (HDR)-based genome editing via selectable long flanking arm donors can be hampered by local transgene silencing at transcriptionally silent loci. Here, we report efficient bi-allelic modification of a silent locus in patient-derived hiPSC by using Cas9 nickase and a silencing-resistant donor construct that contains an excisable selection/counter-selection cassette. To identify the most active single guide RNA (sgRNA)/nickase combinations, we employed a lentiviral vector-based reporter … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of fluorescent NSM excludes random integration events, enabling clearer sorting gates and isolated biallelic populations. This constitutes an advancement over similar approaches ( Eggenschwiler et al., 2016 ). However, potential limitations are that PSMs could be subjected to position-effect variegation or promotor silencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The use of fluorescent NSM excludes random integration events, enabling clearer sorting gates and isolated biallelic populations. This constitutes an advancement over similar approaches ( Eggenschwiler et al., 2016 ). However, potential limitations are that PSMs could be subjected to position-effect variegation or promotor silencing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…These methods necessitate working with a high number of clonal cell lines (typically over a hundred) and can require specialized equipment. Recent PiggyBac transposon methods ( Arias-Fuenzalida et al., 2017 , Eggenschwiler et al., 2016 ) enable complete removal of selectable markers for scarless editing of hPSCs. These methods employ an additional step involving excision of the selectable marker from the edited clones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods for improving specificity have been developed using either pairs of Cas9 enzymes each of which is unable to generate a DSB alone (Guilinger et al 2014 ; Ran et al 2013 ; Tsai et al 2014 ), truncated guide RNAs (Fu et al 2014 ) or protein engineering of Cas9 to improve specificity (Kleinstiver et al 2016 ; Slaymaker et al 2016 ). Some of these strategies including the double nickase approach (Ran et al 2013 ) have been successfully used in hiPS cells (Eggenschwiler et al 2016 ; Wu et al 2016b ), although these systems will never remove the potential for off-target mutations completely. Therefore at least in the case of disease models, where a small number of lines are produced, it is also possible to sequence the putative off-target sites (or even the whole genome), generate cell lines with independent guides each of which would have a different set of off-targets, or perform another round of genome engineering to repair the introduced genetic change.…”
Section: Genome Editing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%