2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Blue, Green, and Red Fluorescent Protein Tagging Vectors for S. cerevisiae

Abstract: Fluorescent protein fusions are a powerful tool to monitor the localization and trafficking of proteins. Such studies are particularly easy to carry out in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae due to the ease with which tags can be introduced into the genome by homologous recombination. However, the available yeast tagging plasmids have not kept pace with the development of new and improved fluorescent proteins. Here, we have constructed yeast optimized versions of 19 different fluorescent proteins and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
225
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
225
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All media were generated as previously described (Ho and Burgess 2011;Lui et al 2013). Gene knockouts and fluorescent tagging were constructed using standard tailed PCR based gene replacement and tagging techniques (Longtine et al 1998;Goldstein and McCusker 1999;Sheff and Thorn 2004;Lee et al 2013). All gene knockouts were confirmed by PCR and new alleles were confirmed by DNA sequencing.…”
Section: Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All media were generated as previously described (Ho and Burgess 2011;Lui et al 2013). Gene knockouts and fluorescent tagging were constructed using standard tailed PCR based gene replacement and tagging techniques (Longtine et al 1998;Goldstein and McCusker 1999;Sheff and Thorn 2004;Lee et al 2013). All gene knockouts were confirmed by PCR and new alleles were confirmed by DNA sequencing.…”
Section: Strainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosome spreads were prepared according to Rockmill (2009) and imaged using a Nikon Structured Illumination super-resolution microscope. The fluorophores imaged in this paper were DAPI, eGFP, mRuby2, and mCherry (Sheff and Thorn 2004;Lee et al 2013). Primary antibodies used in this study include rabbit polyclonal antibody to GFP (Noldus Information Technology NB600-308; 1:2000 dilution), mouse monoclonal antibody to mCherry (World Lab ATB-T5604; 1:2000 dilution).…”
Section: Spotting Assay For Vegetative Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the observed PSM defect in sps1D cells, we reexamined sfGFPSps1 localization and detected a dim, transient localization at the PSM ( Figure S2). sfGFP folds and matures quickly but photobleaches rapidly (Lee et al 2013;Slubowski et al 2015). The PSM localization of sfGFP-Sps1 fades to undetectable levels within 3 sec of epifluorescent illumination, making it difficult to observe.…”
Section: Sps1 Has a Dynamic Localization During Sporulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard genetic methods were used to create strains unless otherwise noted (Rose and Fink 1990). Epitope-tagged strains and gene knockout strains were created using PCR-mediated integration as previously described (Longtine et al 1998;Lee et al 2013). Primers and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S3 and Table S4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, SNAP-SiMPull tags allow the fluorescent properties of the tagged molecule (e.g., the wavelength of emission) to be altered by addition of differently colored fluorophores to the cell lysate rather than by expression of different protein-FP fusions. This is particularly advantageous in cases where different FP fusions have been shown to impact protein function in different ways such as mislocalization of RFP but not GFP-tagged proteins (Lee et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%