2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9991(03)00328-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved boundary conditions for viscous, reacting, compressible flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…about the validation of the present DNS code in both zero and non-zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer flows. Navier-Stokes characteristic boundary conditions (NSCBCs) are implemented based on the original formulation of Poinsot & Lele (1992) and on the later improvements described in Sutherland & Kennedy (2003), Yoo et al (2005) and Yoo & Im (2007). The boundary conditions are non-reflecting at the inflow (x = 0) and outflow (x = L x ) planes (thereby ensuring that spurious pressure waves can exit the domain), no-slip isothermal solid surface at the wall boundaries (y = 0 and y = L y ), and periodic in the spanwise direction (z = 0 and z = L z ).…”
Section: Dns Of Flashback In Turbulent Channel Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…about the validation of the present DNS code in both zero and non-zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer flows. Navier-Stokes characteristic boundary conditions (NSCBCs) are implemented based on the original formulation of Poinsot & Lele (1992) and on the later improvements described in Sutherland & Kennedy (2003), Yoo et al (2005) and Yoo & Im (2007). The boundary conditions are non-reflecting at the inflow (x = 0) and outflow (x = L x ) planes (thereby ensuring that spurious pressure waves can exit the domain), no-slip isothermal solid surface at the wall boundaries (y = 0 and y = L y ), and periodic in the spanwise direction (z = 0 and z = L z ).…”
Section: Dns Of Flashback In Turbulent Channel Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the boundary conditions represent the requirements to be met by the solution x (l, t) at the boundary points of Ω. In general, these conditions may take the form of a linear combination of the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions, as the so-called boundary conditions of the third kind (Dooge and Napiorkowski, 1987;Christofides and Daoutidis, 1997;Sutherland and Kennedy, 2003;Ancona and Coclite, 2005). For the class of hyperbolic systems considered, we assume the Dirichlet boundary conditions, which can be written in the following compact way (see Xu and Sallet, 2002;Diagne et al, 2012):…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can have adverse effects on the reactions rates of species, and can over estimate the calculated energy release for the given conditions. Since the first development of the Navier-Stokes characteristic boundary conditions (NSCBC) for reacting flows [8], Sutherland and Kennedy [11] was the first to recognize that reactive source terms in the conservation equations must be accounted for in the NSCBC formulation in order to describe the correct acoustic behavior at the boundary. This observation subsequently has led to a comprehensive NSCBC formulation for general boundaries with nonuniform convection, viscous diffusion, and reaction effects [8,9].…”
Section: Navier-stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions For Spray-lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since additional sources of momentum, energy, and mass add to the complexity of the gas phase equations, the source terms at the primitive variable have been reformulated and implemented. Following the detailed derivation by Appendix of Sutherland and Kennedy [11], the modified source terms for NSCBC formulation resulting from the droplet evaporation are written as:…”
Section: Navier-stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions For Spray-lmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation