2004
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927604880504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Carbon Analysis with Evactron Plasma Cleaning

Abstract: Analyzing carbon in an electron microscope by EDS is difficult, since the pollution by hydrocarbons is responsible for a fast growing C peak when the beam is positioned in spot mode. Hydrocarbons from the chamber surfaces, vacuum pumps and sample surface migrate, react with the electron beam and form a black spot rich in carbon where the analysis is conducted. The analytical difficulty extends to N, which peak is partially overlapped by the growing adjacent C peak and strongly absorbed by the carbon layer that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The carbon quantification was excluded from this study because of the technical limitation of the EDX in an electron microscope. 20 Elements with lower atomic masses such as carbon (atomic number 6 and lower) are difficult to distinguish from each other using EDX. The carbon x-rays have low energy and are easily absorbed by the x-ray detector windows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The carbon quantification was excluded from this study because of the technical limitation of the EDX in an electron microscope. 20 Elements with lower atomic masses such as carbon (atomic number 6 and lower) are difficult to distinguish from each other using EDX. The carbon x-rays have low energy and are easily absorbed by the x-ray detector windows.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrocarbons from the chamber surfaces, vacuum pumps, and sample surface migrate and react with the electron beam to form a black spot that is rich in carbon. 20 After elemental analysis with the EDX, the retrieved MSIs were subjected to a cleaning cycle of 30 minutes in an ultrasonicator, completely immersed in enzymatic detergent (Cidezyme; ASP: a Johnson and Johnson company, Irvine, Calif) so that organic debris would be removed and the surface topography of the MSIs could be fully observed under the microscope. 16 After cleaning, they were again mounted on carbon stubs and kept in a dessicator for 24 hours, and surface images were taken with SEM (Leo 435VP; SEMTech Solutions, Cambridge, United Kingdom).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plasma cleaners have become common accessories to modern SEMs as they help reduce sample and chamber contamination, and they have even been shown to improve light element sensitivity in EDS measurements (3). However, there is still debate about to which extent cleaning is compatible with x-ray windows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The K line X-ray carbon is easily absorbed only from the surface of the specimen. Significant carbon background signals and hydrocarbon interfere with the quantitative analysis and can be responsible for a fast growing C peak [55]. Nevertheless, the latter explanation does not seem sufficient to explain these high concentrations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For glass ceramic reconstructions, the two elements are assembled by an adhesive system (54). In the literature, these reconstructions are defined as Resin Bonded All Ceramic crowns (RBCs) (55).…”
Section: Mechanical Behavior Of Glass-ceramic Materials/restorationsmentioning
confidence: 99%