1992
DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(92)90070-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved cement barriers applied in nuclear wastes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They concluded that the most appropriate getter in this application was a zeolite and that getter particle size, cement curing temperature and the ratio of water to cement solids (w:s ratio) had little influence on sorption efficiency. Other research has found that by pre-treating the radioactive waste with hexacyanoferrite ions, active caesium and cobalt are bound and leaching of these elements is reduced after encapsulation in cement paste [10]. With regard to the interaction between radioactive elements and the ferric hydroxide floc, Duff et al [11] stated that uranium (VI) is readily sorbed onto amorphous and crystalline ferric oxides and hydroxides such as hematite and goethite (FeOOH) thus preventing uranium transport.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…They concluded that the most appropriate getter in this application was a zeolite and that getter particle size, cement curing temperature and the ratio of water to cement solids (w:s ratio) had little influence on sorption efficiency. Other research has found that by pre-treating the radioactive waste with hexacyanoferrite ions, active caesium and cobalt are bound and leaching of these elements is reduced after encapsulation in cement paste [10]. With regard to the interaction between radioactive elements and the ferric hydroxide floc, Duff et al [11] stated that uranium (VI) is readily sorbed onto amorphous and crystalline ferric oxides and hydroxides such as hematite and goethite (FeOOH) thus preventing uranium transport.…”
Section: Review Of Relevant Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%